FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  
he question, we cannot lean on the evidence of the ceremony of capture. We cannot demonstrate that it is derived from a time when paucity of women made capture of brides necessary. Thus 'honours are easy' in this first deal. (2) The next indication is very curious, and requires much more prolonged discussion. The custom of _Exogamy_ was first noted and named by Mr. M'Lennan. Exogamy is the prohibition of marriage within the supposed blood-kinship, as denoted by the family name. Such marriage, among many backward races, is reckoned incestuous, and is punishable by death. Certain peculiarities in connection with the family name have to be noted later. Now, Sir Henry Maine admits that exogamy, as thus defined, exists among the Hindoos. 'A Hindoo may not marry a woman belonging to the same _gotra_, all members of the _gotra_ being theoretically supposed to have descended from the same ancestor.' The same rule prevails in China. 'There are in China large bodies of related clansmen, each generally bearing the same clan-name. They are exogamous; no man will marry a woman having the same clan-name with himself.' It is admitted by Sir Henry Maine that this wide prohibition of marriage was the early Aryan rule, while advancing civilisation has gradually permitted marriage within limits once forbidden. The Greek Church now (according to Mr. M'Lennan), and the Catholic Church in the past, forbade intermarriages 'as far as relationship could be known.' The Hindoo rule appears to go still further, and to prohibit marriage as far as the common _gotra_ name seems merely to indicate relationship. As to the ancient Romans, Plutarch says: 'Formerly they did not marry women connected with them by blood, any more than they now marry aunts or sisters. It was long before they would even intermarry with cousins.'[214] Plutarch also remarks that, in times past, Romans did not marry ~syngenidas~, and if we may render this 'women of the same _gens_,' the exogamous prohibition in Rome was as complete as among the Hindoos. I do not quite gather from Sir Henry Maine's account of the Slavonic house communities (pp. 254, 255) whether they dislike _all_ kindred marriages, or only marriage within the 'greater blood'--that is, within the kinship on the male side. He says: 'The South Slavonians bring their wives into the group, in which they are socially organised, from a considerable distance outside.... Every marriage which requires an ecclesiastica
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  



Top keywords:
marriage
 

prohibition

 

Lennan

 

Hindoo

 

Hindoos

 

supposed

 

family

 

kinship

 

capture

 
Exogamy

relationship

 

Church

 

Plutarch

 

Romans

 

exogamous

 

requires

 

appears

 
intermarriages
 
forbade
 
common

Formerly

 

ancient

 

connected

 

prohibit

 

sisters

 

Slavonians

 

greater

 

dislike

 
kindred
 

marriages


ecclesiastica
 
distance
 

considerable

 
socially
 
organised
 
render
 

syngenidas

 

cousins

 
remarks
 
complete

communities
 

Slavonic

 

account

 
Catholic
 
gather
 

intermarry

 

related

 

discussion

 

custom

 

denoted