FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
nsiderably condensed from the original, by the excision of various scenes explanatory of the conduct of the story, and by the omission of the cumbersome vision of Leonatus; and the gain of brevity thereby made helps to commend the work to a more gracious acceptance than it would be likely to obtain if acted exactly according to Shakespeare. Its movement also is imbued with additional alacrity by a rearrangement of its divisions. It is customarily presented in six acts. Yet, notwithstanding the cutting and editing to which it has been subjected, _Cymbeline_ remains somewhat inharmonious alike with the needs of the stage and the apprehension of the public. For this there are several causes. One perhaps is its mixed character, its vague, elusive purpose, and its unreality of effect. From the nature of his story--a tale of stern facts and airy inventions, respecting Britain and Rome, two thousand years ago--the poet seems to have been compelled to make a picture of human life too literal to be viewed wholly as an ideal, and too romantic to be viewed wholly as literal. In the unequivocally great plays of Shakespeare the action moves like the mighty flow of some resistless river. In this one it advances with the diffusive and straggling movement of a summer cloud. The drift and meaning of the piece, accordingly, do not stand boldly out. That astute thinker, Ulrici, for instance, after much brooding upon it, ties his mental legs in a hard knot and says that Shakespeare intended, in this piece, to illustrate that man is not the master of his own destiny. There must be liberal scope for conjecture when a philosopher can make such a landing as that. The persons in _Cymbeline_, moreover--aside from the exceptional character of Imogen--do not come home to a spectator's realisation, whether of sympathy or repugnance. It is like the flower that thrives best under glass but shivers and wilts in the open air. Its poetry seems marred by the rude touch of the actual. Its delicious mountain scenes lose their woodland fragrance. Its motive, bluntly disclosed in the wager scene, seems coarse, unnatural, and offensive. Its plot, really simple, moves heavily and perplexes attention. It is a piece that lacks pervasive concentration and enthralling point. It might be defined as _Othello_ with a difference--the difference being in favour of _Othello_. Jealousy is the pivot of both: but in _Othello_ jealousy is treated with profound and searc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 
Othello
 

character

 
movement
 

viewed

 

literal

 
Cymbeline
 

wholly

 

scenes

 

difference


instance

 
Ulrici
 

conjecture

 

liberal

 

thinker

 

philosopher

 

persons

 
exceptional
 

landing

 

Imogen


destiny

 

mental

 

boldly

 

master

 

astute

 
illustrate
 
intended
 

brooding

 
heavily
 

simple


perplexes
 

attention

 

pervasive

 

coarse

 
unnatural
 

offensive

 

concentration

 

enthralling

 
jealousy
 

treated


profound

 
Jealousy
 

defined

 

favour

 

disclosed

 
bluntly
 

thrives

 
flower
 

shivers

 

repugnance