FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
nsiderably condensed from the original, by the excision of various scenes explanatory of the conduct of the story, and by the omission of the cumbersome vision of Leonatus; and the gain of brevity thereby made helps to commend the work to a more gracious acceptance than it would be likely to obtain if acted exactly according to Shakespeare. Its movement also is imbued with additional alacrity by a rearrangement of its divisions. It is customarily presented in six acts. Yet, notwithstanding the cutting and editing to which it has been subjected, _Cymbeline_ remains somewhat inharmonious alike with the needs of the stage and the apprehension of the public. For this there are several causes. One perhaps is its mixed character, its vague, elusive purpose, and its unreality of effect. From the nature of his story--a tale of stern facts and airy inventions, respecting Britain and Rome, two thousand years ago--the poet seems to have been compelled to make a picture of human life too literal to be viewed wholly as an ideal, and too romantic to be viewed wholly as literal. In the unequivocally great plays of Shakespeare the action moves like the mighty flow of some resistless river. In this one it advances with the diffusive and straggling movement of a summer cloud. The drift and meaning of the piece, accordingly, do not stand boldly out. That astute thinker, Ulrici, for instance, after much brooding upon it, ties his mental legs in a hard knot and says that Shakespeare intended, in this piece, to illustrate that man is not the master of his own destiny. There must be liberal scope for conjecture when a philosopher can make such a landing as that. The persons in _Cymbeline_, moreover--aside from the exceptional character of Imogen--do not come home to a spectator's realisation, whether of sympathy or repugnance. It is like the flower that thrives best under glass but shivers and wilts in the open air. Its poetry seems marred by the rude touch of the actual. Its delicious mountain scenes lose their woodland fragrance. Its motive, bluntly disclosed in the wager scene, seems coarse, unnatural, and offensive. Its plot, really simple, moves heavily and perplexes attention. It is a piece that lacks pervasive concentration and enthralling point. It might be defined as _Othello_ with a difference--the difference being in favour of _Othello_. Jealousy is the pivot of both: but in _Othello_ jealousy is treated with profound and searc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 
Othello
 
character
 

movement

 
viewed
 
literal
 
Cymbeline
 

wholly

 

scenes

 

difference


instance
 

Ulrici

 

conjecture

 

liberal

 
thinker
 
philosopher
 

persons

 

exceptional

 

landing

 
Imogen

destiny
 

mental

 

boldly

 

master

 
astute
 

illustrate

 

intended

 
brooding
 

heavily

 
simple

perplexes
 

attention

 

pervasive

 

coarse

 

unnatural

 
offensive
 

concentration

 

enthralling

 

jealousy

 
treated

profound

 

Jealousy

 

defined

 

favour

 
disclosed
 

bluntly

 

thrives

 
flower
 

shivers

 

repugnance