FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  
us, who, after all, are still in the infancy of a spiritualist revival. --------- * "I am afraid," says Thomas Taylor in his Introduction to the Phaedo, "there are scarcely any at the present day who know that it is one thing for the soul to be separated from the body, and another for the body to be separated from the soul, and that the former is by no means a necessary consequence of the latter." ----------- It would not be necessary to premise, but for the frequency with which the phrase occurs, that the "spiritual body" is a contradiction in terms. The office of body is to relate spirit to an objective world. By Platonic writers it is usually termed okhema--"vehicle." It is the medium of action, and also of sensibility. In this philosophy the conception of Soul was not simply, as with us, the immaterial subject of consciousness. How warily the interpreter has to tread here, every one knows who has dipped, even superficially, into the controversies among Platonists themselves. All admit the distinction between the rational and the irrational part or principle, the latter including, first, the sensibility, and secondly, the Plastic, or that lower which in obedience to its sympathies enables the soul to attach itself to, and to organize into a suitable body those substances of the universe to which it is most congruous. It is more difficult to determine whether Plato or his principal followers, recognized in the rational soul or nous a distinct and separable entity, that which is sometimes discriminated as "the Spirit." Dr. Henry More, no mean authority, repudiates this interpretation. "There can be nothing more monstrous," he says, "than to make two souls in man, the one sensitive, the other rational, really distinct from one another, and to give the name of Astral spirit to the former, when there is in man no Astral spirit beside the Plastic of the soul itself, which is always inseparable from that which is rational. Nor upon any other account can it be called Astral, but as it is liable to that corporeal temperament which proceeds from the stars, or rather from any material causes in general, as not being yet sufficiently united with the divine body--that vehicle of divine virtue or power." So he maintains that the Kabalistic three souls--Nephesh, Ruach, Neschamah--originate in a misunderstanding of the true Platonic doctrine, which is that of a threefold "vital congruity." These correspond to the thre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
rational
 

spirit

 

Astral

 

divine

 
sensibility
 
vehicle
 

Platonic

 
distinct
 

separated

 

Plastic


universe

 

monstrous

 
principal
 

determine

 
difficult
 
congruous
 

authority

 

discriminated

 
entity
 

separable


Spirit

 

recognized

 

repudiates

 
substances
 

followers

 
interpretation
 

temperament

 

Kabalistic

 

Nephesh

 

maintains


sufficiently

 

united

 
virtue
 

Neschamah

 

originate

 

congruity

 
correspond
 
threefold
 

misunderstanding

 

doctrine


inseparable

 

account

 

called

 

material

 
general
 

proceeds

 
liable
 

corporeal

 
suitable
 

sensitive