ll of its knowledge is relative. A phenomenon may be
so-and-so with regard to another; but that either is absolute truth we
can not affirm. And yet--mark this well--as Spencer says, 'Every one
of the arguments by which the relativity of our knowledge is
demonstrated distinctly postulates the positive existence of something
beyond the relative.'"
"And just what does that mean?" asked Miss Wall.
"It is a primitive statement of what is sometimes called the 'Theory
of suppositional opposites'", replied Hitt. "It means that to every
reality there is the corresponding unreality. For every truth there
may be postulated the supposition. We can not, as the great
philosopher says, conceive that our knowledge is a knowledge of
appearances only, without at the same time conceiving a reality of
which they are appearances. He further amplifies this by saying that
'every positive notion--the concept of a thing by what it is--suggests
a negative notion--the concept of a thing by what it is not. But,
though these mutually suggest each other, _the positive alone is
real_.' Most momentous language, that! For, interpreted, it means: we
must deny the seeming, or that which appears to human sense, in order
to see that which is real."
"Well, I declare!" exclaimed Miss Wall, glancing about to note the
effect of the speaker's words on the others.
But Carmen nodded her thorough agreement, and added: "Did not Jesus
say that we must deny ourselves? Deny which self? Why, the self that
appears to us, the matter-man, the dust-man, the man of the second
chapter of Genesis. We must deny his reality, and know that he is
nothing but a mental concept, formed out of suppositional thought, out
of dust-thought. And that is material thought."
"Undoubtedly correct," said Hitt, turning to Carmen. "But, before we
consider the astonishing teachings of Jesus, let us sum up the
conclusions of philosophy. To begin with, then, there is a First
Cause, omnipotent and omnipresent, and of very necessity perfect. That
Cause lies back of all the phenomena of life; and, because of its real
existence, there arises the suppositional existence of its opposite,
its negative, so to speak, which is unreal. The phenomena of human
existence have to do _only_ with the suppositional existence of the
great First Cause's opposite. They are a reflection of that
supposition. Hence all human knowledge of an external world is but
phenomenal, and consists of appearances which hav
|