FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  
ong ones? Answer: _Love me and the World is Mine_ is a short song (although it seldom sounds so) while Schubert's _C major Symphony_ is called the "symphony of heavenly length." Is what is new better than what is old? Is what is old better than what is new? Schoenberg is new; is he therefor to be considered better than Beethoven? Stravinsky is new; is he therefor to be considered worse than Liszt? Is an opera better than a song? Compare _Pagliacci_ and Strauss's _Standchen_. Is a string quartet better than a piece for the piano? But I grow weary.... Under the circumstances it would seem that if you have any strong opinions about music you are perfectly entitled to them, for the critics do not agree and you will find many of them basing their criticism on some of the various hypotheses I have advanced. H. T. Finck tells us that the sonata form is illogical, forgetting perhaps that once it served its purpose; Jean Marnold dubbed _Armide_ an _oeuvre batarde_; John F. Runciman called _Parsifal_ "decrepit stuff," while Ernest Newman assures us that it is "marvellous"; Pierre Lalo and Philip Hale disagree on the subject of Debussy's _La Mer_ while W. J. Henderson and James Huneker wrangle over Richard Strauss's _Don Quixote_. The clue to the whole matter lies in a short phrase: Imitative work is always bad. Music that tries to be something that something else has been may be thrown aside as worthless. It will not endure although it may sometimes please the zanies and jackoclocks of a generation. The critic, therefor, who comes nearest to the heart of the matter, is he who, either through instinct or familiarity with the various phenomena of music, is able to judge of a work's originality. There must be individuality in new music to make it worthy of our attention, and that, after all is all that matters. For the tiniest folk-song often persists in the hearts and minds of the people, often stirs the pulse of a musician, pursuing its tuneful way through two centuries, while a mighty thundering symphony of the same period may lie dead and rotting, food for the Niptus Hololencus and the Blatta Germanica. We still sing _The Old Folks At Home_ and _Le Cycle du Vin_ but we have laid aside _Di Tanti Palpiti_. Any piece of music possessing the certain magic power of individuality is of value, it matters not whether it be symphony or song, opera or dance. What most critics have forgotten is that in Music matter, form, and idea a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

therefor

 

matter

 

symphony

 

individuality

 
critics
 

Strauss

 

called

 

considered

 

matters

 

originality


attention

 

phenomena

 

worthy

 
critic
 
thrown
 
worthless
 

endure

 

nearest

 

instinct

 

familiarity


tiniest

 

zanies

 

jackoclocks

 
generation
 

tuneful

 

Palpiti

 
possessing
 
Germanica
 

Blatta

 
pursuing

musician
 

persists

 
hearts
 

people

 
centuries
 

mighty

 

rotting

 
Niptus
 

Hololencus

 

forgotten


thundering

 
period
 

Philip

 

strong

 
circumstances
 

opinions

 

basing

 

criticism

 
perfectly
 

entitled