FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   >>  
ged me most strongly, though he said that he did not know the plans of the German military authorities, not to make the neutrality of Belgium one of our conditions when I spoke in the House. It was a day of great pressure, for we had another Cabinet in the morning, and I had no time to record the conversation, and therefore it does not appear in the "White Paper"; but it was impossible to withdraw that condition [loud cheers] without becoming a consenting party to the violation of the treaty, and subsequently to a German attack on Belgium. After I spoke in the House we made to the German Government the communication described in No. 153 in the "White Paper" about the neutrality of Belgium. Sir Edward Goschen's report of the reply to that communication had not been received when the "White Paper" was printed and laid. It will be laid before Parliament to complete the "White Paper." I have been asked why I did not refer to No. 123 in the "White Paper" when I spoke in the House on Aug. 3. If I had referred to suggestions to us as to conditions of neutrality I must have referred to No. 85, the proposals made, not personally by the Ambassador, but officially by the German Chancellor, which were so condemned by the Prime Minister subsequently, and this would have made the case against the German Government much stronger than I did make it in my speech. ["Hear, hear!"] I deliberately refrained from doing that then. Let me add this about personal suggestions made by the German Ambassador, as distinct from communications made on behalf of his Government. He worked for peace; but real authority at Berlin did not rest with him and others like him, and that is one reason why our efforts for peace failed. [Loud cheers.] _Mr. Keir Hardie_--May I ask whether any attempt was made to open up negotiations with Germany on the basis of suggestions here set forth by the German Ambassador? _Sir E. Grey_--The German Ambassador did not make any basis of suggestions. It was the German Chancellor who made the basis of suggestions. The German Ambassador, speaking on his own personal initiative and without authority, asked whether we would formulate conditions on which we would be neutral. We did go into that question, and those conditions were stated to the House and made known to the German Ambassador. _Mr. Keir Hardie_ [who was received with cries of "Oh!" from all parts of the House]--May I ask whether the German authorities at Be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   >>  



Top keywords:

German

 

Ambassador

 

suggestions

 

conditions

 
Belgium
 
neutrality
 

Government

 

authority

 

referred

 

subsequently


Hardie

 
communication
 

received

 

Chancellor

 
authorities
 

personal

 
cheers
 
behalf
 
refrained
 

deliberately


distinct

 

worked

 
communications
 

Berlin

 

neutral

 
formulate
 

initiative

 

question

 
stated
 
speaking

failed
 

attempt

 
efforts
 
reason
 

negotiations

 

Germany

 

impossible

 

withdraw

 
condition
 

conversation


attack

 
treaty
 

violation

 

consenting

 

record

 

strongly

 

military

 

morning

 

Cabinet

 

pressure