FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>  
stimates, then we had better be prepared to reject most historical testimony. We may then base our calculation on 75 Indians for the Bale ranch, 400 for the Caymus ranch, and 600 for the Salvador ranch. The Juarez and the Higuera ranches contained a "large number." Since the largest number actually given is 600, we may with safety consider that 300 would represent a "large number." A "still larger number" could reasonably be 400. The total then becomes 2,075. Menefee, however, is careful to state that this included only the Indians who were "in some sense" permanently located, and puts the unattached number in the "thousands." The latter can of course be scaled down drastically. Hundreds would be a good substitute, with a possible total of one thousand. The outcome then is that the Indian population of Napa Valley as a whole in 1843 was about 3,000, or identical with Yount's minimum estimate. What was, now, the population aboriginally? The mission baptisms are of no use to us since the Indians in 1843 included most of the ex-neophytes in the area. That there had already been a profound reduction at that time is unquestioned. The north shore of the Bay had been subject to military, clerical, and civilian incursion since the beginning of the century. Lethal epidemics had swept over the country repeatedly. Massacre and slaughter had been the rule rather than the exception. Indeed, the open valley through Sonoma and Napa up to Calistoga had suffered more seriously than any other area except perhaps the delta of the Sacramento River. A population reduction from the aboriginal level by one-third prior to 1843 would not be out of line with the apparent facts. The estimates for the period 1840-1845 derived from Yount, Hittell, and Menefee included the Central Wappo with the more southern groups. For the Central Wappo the ethnographic sources and the mission records indicated an aboriginal population of 450 or 500. However, it is probably advisable to disregard this small division as a separate entity and include it with the remaining Wappo and the Suscol Wintun. If we then take Yount's minimum estimate of 3,000 for the Napa Valley south of Mt. St. Helena and if we assume a one-third decrease in numbers from aboriginal times to 1843, the final estimate for the area becomes 4,500. The figure just derived is of course considerably greater than would be indicated by either the ethnographic village lists or the mission baptis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>  



Top keywords:

number

 

population

 
included
 
estimate
 

mission

 

aboriginal

 
Indians
 

Valley

 

Menefee

 
minimum

Central
 

reduction

 

derived

 

ethnographic

 

valley

 

Massacre

 

repeatedly

 

Indeed

 

slaughter

 

exception


Sonoma

 
country
 
Sacramento
 

Calistoga

 

suffered

 
sources
 

Helena

 

assume

 

remaining

 
Suscol

Wintun
 
decrease
 

numbers

 
greater
 

village

 

baptis

 
considerably
 

figure

 

include

 

entity


Hittell

 

southern

 
groups
 

period

 

estimates

 

apparent

 

disregard

 
division
 

separate

 

advisable