FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
o the patient?" "She saw me taking away the syringe, and of course could conclude that I inserted the needle myself. Nevertheless her opinion was only an opinion; it was not knowledge." "Very well. You admit that she had a right to her opinion, and that you suspected what that opinion would be. Now, of course you realized, being an intellectual man, that such evidence would weigh against you?" "I fully appreciated the gravity of the situation." "And that if not refuted, this testimony almost alone, would tend towards a conviction?" "Yes." "Therefore you decided to claim that the drug was self-administered, knowing that the administration would be proved?" "I knew that the administration of the drug would be proved. But my reason for saying that it was self-administered, is because it is the truth." "That will be for the jury to decide!" With this parting shot the lawyer dismissed the witness, and his own counsel decided to ask no further questions. The clergyman who had performed the marriage ceremony, then took the stand, and testified to the validity of the marriage. He was not cross-examined. Then a celebrated expert toxicologist was called, Professor Newburg. He testified in corroboration of the claims of the defence, and especially to the large doses of morphine, which he had known to be tolerated by persons accustomed to it by habit. It also was claimed by him, that persons who had been known to take as much as four and five grains per day without ill effect, had suddenly died from so small a dose as half a grain. He thought that in these cases the drug had accumulated in the system, and the whole quantity stored up, was made active by the assimilation of the last dose, which of itself would not have been poisonous. Cross-examination did not materially alter his testimony. Next a pathologist was introduced, and in answer to a long hypothetical question, based upon the testimony of Dr. Fisher and the experts for the prosecution, he said that in his opinion the deceased died from anaemia, following diphtheria. The symptoms of morphine poisoning observed were probably due to the morphine which she had taken, but under the conditions described, he did not think that even three and a half grains would have caused death. He came to this conclusion, arguing that the condition of the kidneys showed that they were diseased, and the tendency would have been to store up this last dose, just as pre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

opinion

 
testimony
 

morphine

 

testified

 

decided

 

marriage

 

administered

 

proved

 
grains
 

persons


administration

 

stored

 

assimilation

 

accumulated

 

system

 
quantity
 

active

 

claimed

 
accustomed
 

thought


suddenly

 

effect

 

pathologist

 

caused

 
conditions
 

tendency

 

diseased

 

showed

 

conclusion

 

arguing


condition

 

kidneys

 
observed
 
poisoning
 

answer

 

introduced

 

hypothetical

 

question

 

poisonous

 

examination


materially

 
anaemia
 

diphtheria

 

symptoms

 

deceased

 

Fisher

 

experts

 

prosecution

 
appreciated
 
evidence