FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  
earnestness, promptitude, and energy it displays--not, in short, for what it does not do, but for what it does do, in striking down the rebellion. It is vain for you to justify your conduct by professions of allegiance to the sovereign people and loyalty to the Government. Why, it is the great will of the sovereign people (to whom you profess such faithful allegiance) that the Government (to which you profess such devoted loyalty) should be saved from destruction by crushing to utter extinction the armed rebellion that seeks its overthrow. And the Administration--and I may include Congress, since the action of that body is also the object of your denunciation--is the organ of the sovereign people, carrying out its sovereign will in all the acts you denounce. I do not say that the conduct of affairs has been in all respects satisfactory to the people. There have been too many things that looked to them like want of heart, want of earnestness, want of energy, want of wisdom, particularly in the earlier conduct of the war--too many indications of a disposition, if not to protract the struggle, yet to make this terrible crisis of the nation a time for political combinations and contractors' gains. They have seen these things with grief and stern displeasure. But the acts you denounce meet their sovereign approval. They are in favor of all earnest and vigorous measures for subduing the rebels, and for repressing and punishing traitorous sympathy with them, and treasonable aid and comfort to them. But you denounce these acts as unconstitutional. To a bare, unsupported assumption it might be enough to say that the constitutionality of all these acts has been again and again affirmed by authorities of far greater weight than yours or mine--by scores of statesmen and judges of the highest eminence in the land. But I will go a little into the question. I assert that it is perfectly constitutional to repress an armed rebellion by force of arms. It is the sworn duty of the Administration under the Constitution to do so. And all the acts you condemn come in one way or another under powers delegated to Congress and to the Executive. The constitutional right to make war carries with it the constitutional right to employ all the means sanctioned by the laws of war. This is the amply sufficient justification of each and every one of the measures you denounce--the Emancipation Proclamation, the Confiscation acts, the suspension of _h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sovereign
 
people
 
denounce
 
constitutional
 

conduct

 

rebellion

 

Administration

 

measures

 

Congress

 

energy


profess

 

earnestness

 

loyalty

 

Government

 

things

 

allegiance

 

treasonable

 
sympathy
 
statesmen
 

traitorous


judges

 

scores

 
punishing
 

highest

 

eminence

 

assumption

 
unsupported
 

comfort

 

constitutionality

 
weight

greater

 
affirmed
 

unconstitutional

 

authorities

 
Constitution
 

sanctioned

 

employ

 

Executive

 

carries

 

sufficient


Confiscation

 
suspension
 
Proclamation
 

Emancipation

 

justification

 

delegated

 

powers

 

repress

 

perfectly

 
assert