FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383  
384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   >>  
try the queen's accomplices.] [Sidenote: The queen and her brother to be tried by the House of Lords.] Men are apt to pass vaguely over the words "a commission" or "a jury," regarding them rather as mechanical abstractions than as bodies of responsible men. I shall therefore give the list of the persons who, in these or any other capacities, were engaged upon the trials. The special commission consisted of Sir Thomas Audeley, the lord chancellor; the Duke of Norfolk, uncle of the queen and of Lord Rochfort; the Duke of Suffolk, the king's brother-in-law; the Earl of Wiltshire, the queen's father; the Earls of Oxford, Westmoreland, and Sussex; Lord Sandys; Thomas Cromwell; Sir William Fitzwilliam the Lord High Admiral, an old man whose career had been of the most distinguished brilliancy; Sir William Paulet, lord treasurer, afterwards Marquis of Winchester; and, finally, the nine judges of the Courts of Westminster, Sir John Fitzjames, Sir John Baldewyn, Sir Richard Lister, Sir John Porte, Sir John Spelman, Sir Walter Luke, Sir Anthony Fitzherbert, Sir Thomas Englefield, and Sir William Shelley. The duty of this tribunal was to try the four commoners accused of adultery with the queen. She herself, with her brother, would be tried by the House of Lords. Of the seven peers, three were her own nearest connexions; the remaining commissioners were those who, individually and professionally, might have been considered competent for the conduct of the cause above all other persons in the realm. Antecedently to experience, we should not have expected that a commission so constituted would have lent itself to a conspiracy; and if foul play had been intended, we should have looked to see some baser instruments selected for so iniquitous a purpose. [Sidenote: Wednesday, May 10. True bill found by the grand jury of Middlesex.] In the middle of the second week in May, the grand juries had completed their work. On the 10th, a true bill was found at Westminster, by the oaths of Giles Heron, Esq.; Roger More, Esq.; Richard Awnsham, Esq.; Thomas Byllyngton, Esq.; Gregory Lovel, Esq.; John Worsop, Esq.; William Goddard, gentleman; William Blakwall, gentleman; John Wylford, gentleman; William Berd, gentleman; Henry Hubbylthorne, gentleman; William Huning, gentleman; Robert Walys, gentleman; John Englond, gentleman; Henry Lodysman, gentleman; and John Averey, gentleman. [Sidenote: Thursday, May 11. True bill found by the grand ju
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383  
384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   >>  



Top keywords:
gentleman
 

William

 
Thomas
 

commission

 

Sidenote

 

brother

 
persons
 

Westminster

 
Richard
 
conspiracy

constituted

 

intended

 

looked

 

individually

 

professionally

 
commissioners
 

remaining

 

nearest

 

connexions

 

considered


competent

 

Antecedently

 
experience
 

conduct

 
expected
 

completed

 
Worsop
 

Goddard

 

Blakwall

 
Wylford

Gregory
 

Awnsham

 

Byllyngton

 

Hubbylthorne

 

Averey

 

Thursday

 

Lodysman

 

Englond

 

Huning

 

Robert


Middlesex

 

middle

 

Wednesday

 
purpose
 
instruments
 

selected

 

iniquitous

 

juries

 

Spelman

 
consisted