FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259  
260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>   >|  
e danger of their destruction. They have lost such a wind and fair weather, as I doubt they shall not have again for this winter season. Mr. Brereton (Sir William Brereton, Skeffington's second in command) lieth here at the sea side in a readiness. If their first appointment to Dublin had been kept, they might have been there; but now they tarry to pass with the deputy. Sir, for the love of God, let some aid be sent to Dublin; for the loss of that city and the castle were the plain subversion of the land."--Allen to Cromwell, Oct. 4: _State Papers_, Vol. II. p. 202. [348] Instructions to Walter Cowley on behalf of the Earl of Ossory: Ibid. p. 251. [349] Sir William Brereton to Henry VIII.: Ibid. p. 204. [350] Two thousand five hundred was the smallest number which Lord Surrey previously mentioned as sufficient to do good.--_State Papers_, Vol. II. p. 73. [351] Fifteen miles north of Dublin; immediately off Malahide. [352] Sir William Brereton and Sir John Salisbury to Henry VIII.: _State Papers_, Vol. II. p. 203. [353] A small harbour near Drogheda. [354] Skeffington was prudently reserved in his report of these things to Henry. He mentions having set a party on shore, but says nothing of their having been destroyed; and he could not have been ignorant of their fate, for he was writing three weeks after it, from Dublin. He was silent, too, of the injury which he had received from the pirates, though eloquent on the boats which he burnt at the Skerries.--_State Papers_, Vol. II. p. 205. On first reading Skeffington's despatch, I had supposed that the "brilliant victory" claimed by the Irish historians (see Leland, Vol. II. p. 148) must have been imaginary. The Irish Statute Book, however, is too explicit to allow of such a hope. "He [Fitzgerald] not only fortified and manned divers ships at sea, for keeping and letting, destroying and taking the king's deputy, army, and subjects, that they should not land within the said land; but also at the arrival of the said army, the same Thomas, accompanied with his uncles, servants, adherents, &c., falsely and traitorously assembled themselves together upon the sea coast, for keeping and resisting the king's deputy and army; and the same time they shamefully murdered divers of the said army coming to land. And Edward Rowkes, pirate at the sea, captain to the said Thomas, destroyed and took many of them."--- Act of Attainder of the Earl of Kildare: 28 Hen. VIII. cap.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259  
260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Papers
 

Dublin

 

Brereton

 

Skeffington

 

deputy

 

William

 

destroyed

 

Thomas

 

divers

 
keeping

despatch

 

supposed

 

imaginary

 

brilliant

 

reading

 

Skerries

 

victory

 
claimed
 
Leland
 
historians

ignorant

 

Attainder

 

Kildare

 

writing

 

injury

 

received

 

pirates

 

silent

 
eloquent
 

subjects


taking
 
letting
 

destroying

 
traitorously
 
falsely
 
servants
 

adherents

 

uncles

 
accompanied
 
arrival

assembled
 

resisting

 

captain

 
pirate
 
explicit
 

Rowkes

 

Fitzgerald

 

coming

 

murdered

 

shamefully