FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350  
351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   >>   >|  
pale sandstone to which the hills of Hoy and the rocks of Duncansbay Head and of Tarbet Ness belong. Further, in the second place, while the upper or Holoptychian formation is found _directly_ overlying that of the Coccosteus in only one locality,--Moray,--we find it directly overlying that of the Cephalaspis in _two_ widely separated localities;--in the vast band of Old Red which runs diagonally across the island from sea to sea, parallel to the Grampian chain, and in the immensely developed Red Sandstones of England and Wales. And it is of course more probable that the two corroborative instances should represent the natural succession of the formations, and the single instance the accidental gap in the scale consequent on the missing formation, than that, _vice versa_, the solitary instance should represent the natural succession, while the two mutually corroborative ones should represent, in localities widely apart, the mere accident of the gap. But, in the third place, I attach more weight to a conclusion founded on the positive character of the groups of organic remains by which the three great formations of the Old Red System are characterized, than I do to either of these considerations. The organisms of the Cephalaspian deposits differ _generically_, and in their whole aspect, from both those of the Coccostean and Holoptychian formations; whereas the organisms of the Coccostean formations, while they resemble generically and in the group those of the Holoptychian one, mainly differ from them _specifically_. The extreme _generic_ difference in the one case argues evidently a great difference in _condition_,--the lesser specific difference in the other, a great difference in point _of time_. The Cephalaspian formation might, as a fresh water formation, be nearly contemporary with either of the other two, or, as seems more probable, interposed between them; while they themselves, on the other hand, generically similar and decidedly marine in their character, must have been so widely separated in time, that all the species of the lower group became extinct ere those of the upper one had been ushered into being. And such are some of the considerations that still lead me, notwithstanding the failure of previous evidence, to hold, at least, provisionally, that our Scottish flagstones to the north of the Grampians occupy a lower horizon than our Scottish tilestones to the south. It must, however, be stated, on the other
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350  
351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

difference

 

formations

 
formation
 

represent

 

widely

 

generically

 

Holoptychian

 

instance

 

succession

 

natural


probable

 
Scottish
 
corroborative
 

organisms

 
Coccostean
 
Cephalaspian
 

differ

 

considerations

 

character

 

directly


separated

 

overlying

 

localities

 

interposed

 

contemporary

 

marine

 

decidedly

 

similar

 

lesser

 
specific

condition

 

evidently

 
argues
 

Tarbet

 

Duncansbay

 
sandstone
 

flagstones

 
provisionally
 

Grampians

 
stated

tilestones

 

occupy

 

horizon

 
evidence
 

previous

 

ushered

 
extinct
 

species

 

belong

 
notwithstanding