FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152  
153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  
n. ~Pseudemys scripta ornata~ (Gray) _Emys ornata_ Gray, Synopsis reptilium, p. 30, 1831.--Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico. _Pseudemys scripta ornata_, Carr, Herpetologica, 1:135, December 30, 1938. The systematics and distribution of _Pseudemys scripta_ in Mexico and Central America are poorly understood. Smith and Taylor (1950b:32) recorded this turtle from the Pacific lowlands of Sinaloa, Jalisco, Oaxaca, and Chiapas. This species is represented by vicarious populations throughout the Atlantic lowlands of Mexico, northwestern Mexico, over much of the United States, and also in Baja California. Along the Pacific coast of Mexico the species seems to be extremely rare, or, at least, only locally abundant. Since the species has such a wide distribution, and since it occurs on the Pacific lowlands both to the north and to the south of Michoacan, it is reasonable to expect its presence on the coast of Michoacan. Inquiries among the natives living in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin produced only negative evidence about the occurrence of _Pseudemys_ in the Rio Tepalcatepec and Rio Balsas. I suspect that the best place to search for these turtles on the coast of Michoacan is in the numerous fresh-water lagoons on the coastal plain. ~Caiman crocodilus fuscus~ (Cope) _Perosuchus fuscus_ Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 20:203, November 9, 1868.--Rio Magdalena, Columbia. _Caiman crocodilus fuscus_, Mertens, Senckenbergiana, 26:275, December 22, 1943. Gadow (1930:50) reported that _Caiman sclerops_ (= _Caiman crocodilus fuscus_) inhabited the "tierra caliente" in Michoacan. Smith and Taylor (1950b:212) accepted Gadow's record for the State, although otherwise the species is unknown north of Oaxaca. Peters (1954:10) refuted Gadow's record on the basis that Gadow's collections contained no specimens of _Caiman_. The local name "caiman" refers to both _Crocodylus_ and to _Caiman_, for, in general, the natives do not distinguish between the two. "Caimanes" are reported from along the coast of Michoacan, where the name presumably refers to _Crocodylus acutus acutus_, and in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin (Gadow, 1930:50; Webber, 1946:267). I have seen no specimens of either _Crocodylus_ or _Caiman_ from the Balsas Basin. If crocodilians do occur in the basin, they probably are _Crocodylus acutus acutus_. There is no basis, whatsoever, for including Michoacan in the ra
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152  
153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  



Top keywords:
Caiman
 

Michoacan

 

Mexico

 

species

 

Balsas

 
Pseudemys
 
fuscus
 

acutus

 
Crocodylus
 

lowlands


Pacific

 

Tepalcatepec

 
crocodilus
 

ornata

 
scripta
 

specimens

 
December
 
refers
 

Sinaloa

 

reported


record

 

natives

 

Oaxaca

 

Taylor

 

distribution

 

including

 

whatsoever

 

sclerops

 

caliente

 

tierra


Perosuchus

 
inhabited
 

November

 

Magdalena

 

Columbia

 
accepted
 

Senckenbergiana

 
Mertens
 

Philadelphia

 
general

Webber
 

caiman

 
distinguish
 
Caimanes
 

unknown

 

Peters

 
contained
 

collections

 
crocodilians
 

refuted