FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
7) actually are sulphur-yellow in life. ~Loxocemus bicolor~ Cope _Loxocemus bicolor_ Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 13:77, June 30, 1861.--La Union, El Salvador. _Loxocemus sumichrasti_ Bocourt, Ann. Sci. Nat., ser. 6, 4:1, 1876.--Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico. Apatzingan (6); La Orilla; Lombardia. As noted by Peters (1954:21), this species was not recorded from Michoacan by Smith and Taylor (1945:27), but Gadow (1930:30) collected a specimen at La Orilla in 1908. This specimen (BMNH 1914.1.28.124) is a male having 235 ventrals and 47 caudals, a dark brown dorsum, and cream-colored labials and venter. The anterior chin-shields are considerably longer than the scales bordering the chin-shields. In these characters this specimen agrees with the diagnosis of _Loxocemus bicolor_ given by Taylor (1940c:447), who revived _Loxocemus sumichrasti_ Bocourt. Of the six specimens from Apatzingan in the Tepalcatepec Valley, three males have 243 to 253 (246.6) ventrals and 44 to 45 (44.3) caudals; three females have 238 to 247 (244.0) ventrals and 42 to 44 (43.0) caudals. Certain characters of scutellation utilized by Taylor for separating _L. bicolor_ and _L. sumichrasti_ are inconsistent in this series. The chin-shields are longer than the adjacent scales, like those illustrated in _L. bicolor_ by Taylor (_op. cit._, fig. 1). The relative lengths of the prefrontal and internasal sutures are subequal, or the prefrontal suture is slightly longer. Thus, in these characters of scutellation these snakes are like _L. bicolor_, but in coloration they are like _L. sumichrasti_; the dorsal color in life was an iridescent dark bluish gray, and the belly was pale gray or bluish gray. The supposed differences in scutellation between _L. bicolor_ and _L. sumichrasti_ have been questioned by Woodbury and Woodbury (1944:360); these authors treated _L. sumichrasti_ as a subspecies of _L. bicolor_. As pointed out by Zweifel (1959b:5), such an arrangement is not tenable, for, although individuals with each kind of color pattern have not been collected together at any one locality, the over-all geographic picture is one of sympatric distribution. Only snakes having the coloration of _L. sumichrasti_ have been collected in the Balsas-Tepalcatepec Basin. I agree with Zweifel (_loc. cit._) that on the basis of morphological similarities and sympatric distribution, _L. bicolor_ and _L. sumichrasti_ seem t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

bicolor

 
sumichrasti
 

Loxocemus

 

Taylor

 

caudals

 

collected

 
specimen
 

ventrals

 

characters

 

longer


scutellation

 

shields

 

coloration

 
snakes
 
Woodbury
 

Zweifel

 

Apatzingan

 

Orilla

 

bluish

 

distribution


sympatric
 

prefrontal

 
Bocourt
 

Tepalcatepec

 
scales
 
iridescent
 

subequal

 

illustrated

 

adjacent

 
inconsistent

series
 
relative
 
lengths
 
slightly
 

suture

 

internasal

 

sutures

 

dorsal

 

pointed

 
geographic

picture

 

Balsas

 

locality

 
morphological
 

similarities

 

pattern

 

authors

 
treated
 

questioned

 

supposed