FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  
them. The complaints increased in number and intensity and Members of Parliament and newspaper writers joined in the jeremiad. Parliament, as Parliaments do, yielded to clamour, and in 1881 a Select Committee was appointed by the House of Commons to inquire into railway charges, into the laws and conditions affecting such charges, and specially into passenger fares. It was a big committee, consisted of 23 members, took 858 pages of evidence, and examined 80 witnesses. At the end of the session they reported that, although they had sat continuously, time had failed for consideration of the evidence, and recommended that the committee be re-appointed in the next session. This was done, and the committee, enlarged to 27 members, took further evidence, and submitted a report to Parliament. The gravest issue was the right of the companies to charge terminals, and the committee found that the railways had made out their case, and recommended that the right of the companies to station terminals should be recognised by Parliament. Further, the committee, on the whole of the evidence, acquitted the railway companies of any grave dereliction of their duty to the public, and added: "It is remarkable that no witnesses have appeared to complain of 'preferences' given to individuals by railway companies as acts of private favour or partiality." As to passenger fares, the committee reported that the complaints submitted to them were rather local than general, and not of an important character, but thought that it might be well for the Railway Commissioners to have the same jurisdiction in respect to passengers as to goods traffic. The railway companies thus emerged from this searching inquiry with credit, as they have done in the many investigations to which they have been subjected, and no high-minded and aspiring young railway novice need ever blush for the traditions of the service. Before the committee Mr. James Grierson, General Manager of the Great Western, was the principal witness for the railway companies, and yeoman service he rendered. He presented the railway case with great ability, and his views were accepted on the important terminal question. In 1886 he published a book on _Railway Rates_, which was warmly welcomed by the Press and, in the words of _Herepath's Journal_, was "an exhaustive, able, and dispassionate _resume_ of all the conflicting statements, claims, and interests verging round the much vex
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
railway
 

committee

 

companies

 

evidence

 

Parliament

 
submitted
 
complaints
 

service

 
recommended
 

witnesses


session

 

reported

 
terminals
 

Railway

 
important
 

members

 
charges
 
passenger
 

appointed

 

investigations


Herepath

 

credit

 

searching

 

inquiry

 

subjected

 

novice

 

conflicting

 

aspiring

 

minded

 

resume


Journal

 
exhaustive
 

dispassionate

 

thought

 

Commissioners

 
emerged
 

traffic

 
jurisdiction
 

respect

 
passengers

traditions
 

presented

 
verging
 
yeoman
 

published

 

rendered

 
ability
 

claims

 
question
 

terminal