FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  
them. The complaints increased in number and intensity and Members of Parliament and newspaper writers joined in the jeremiad. Parliament, as Parliaments do, yielded to clamour, and in 1881 a Select Committee was appointed by the House of Commons to inquire into railway charges, into the laws and conditions affecting such charges, and specially into passenger fares. It was a big committee, consisted of 23 members, took 858 pages of evidence, and examined 80 witnesses. At the end of the session they reported that, although they had sat continuously, time had failed for consideration of the evidence, and recommended that the committee be re-appointed in the next session. This was done, and the committee, enlarged to 27 members, took further evidence, and submitted a report to Parliament. The gravest issue was the right of the companies to charge terminals, and the committee found that the railways had made out their case, and recommended that the right of the companies to station terminals should be recognised by Parliament. Further, the committee, on the whole of the evidence, acquitted the railway companies of any grave dereliction of their duty to the public, and added: "It is remarkable that no witnesses have appeared to complain of 'preferences' given to individuals by railway companies as acts of private favour or partiality." As to passenger fares, the committee reported that the complaints submitted to them were rather local than general, and not of an important character, but thought that it might be well for the Railway Commissioners to have the same jurisdiction in respect to passengers as to goods traffic. The railway companies thus emerged from this searching inquiry with credit, as they have done in the many investigations to which they have been subjected, and no high-minded and aspiring young railway novice need ever blush for the traditions of the service. Before the committee Mr. James Grierson, General Manager of the Great Western, was the principal witness for the railway companies, and yeoman service he rendered. He presented the railway case with great ability, and his views were accepted on the important terminal question. In 1886 he published a book on _Railway Rates_, which was warmly welcomed by the Press and, in the words of _Herepath's Journal_, was "an exhaustive, able, and dispassionate _resume_ of all the conflicting statements, claims, and interests verging round the much vex
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

railway

 

committee

 

companies

 

evidence

 

Parliament

 

submitted

 

complaints

 
service
 

recommended

 

witnesses


session
 

reported

 

terminals

 

Railway

 
important
 
members
 

charges

 

passenger

 

appointed

 

investigations


Herepath

 

credit

 

searching

 

inquiry

 
subjected
 

novice

 

conflicting

 
aspiring
 

minded

 

resume


Journal

 

exhaustive

 

dispassionate

 

thought

 

Commissioners

 

emerged

 

traffic

 

jurisdiction

 
respect
 

passengers


traditions

 

presented

 

verging

 

yeoman

 

published

 

rendered

 

ability

 

claims

 
question
 

terminal