FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>  
vided art, o'er all supreme. Thou art the first of Gods, the ancient Sire, The treasure-house supreme of all the worlds. The Knowing and the Known, the highest seat. From Thee the All has sprung, O boundless Form! Varuna, Vayu, Agni, Yama thou,[6] The Moon; the Sire and Grandsire too of men. The Infinite in power, of boundless force, The All thou dost embrace; the Thou art All."[7] [Sidenote: Omission of Buddhism.] These illustrations must suffice for Indian Pantheism. Because, with Buddhism we have nothing to do. For, according to its ablest European exponent (Professor T.W. Rhys Davids), that system of religion simply ignored the conception of an All in All. And this not at all on philosophical grounds, but because its aims were entirely practical. For the aim of its founder was to show men how by a virtuous life, or lives, they might at last attain annihilation--or, at any rate, the extinction of the individual self, the apparent separateness of which was, in his view, the source of all misery. And if he could teach his followers to attain that salvation, he was entirely indifferent as to the opinions they might hold about the ultimate nature of the world, provided only that they did not fall into any heresy which proclaimed an immortal soul.[8] [Sidenote: Persian Religions, not strictly Pantheistic.] [Sidenote: A World Drama or Process is a Human, not a Divine Aspect of Things.] The accounts given to us by the best authorities on Zoroaster and Parseeism scarcely justify us in thinking the religion of the Zendavesta to be Pantheistic in our sense of the term. For though it would appear that Ormuzd (or Ahuramazda), the God of light and goodness, originated in, or was born from and one with a nameless impersonal Unity, such as may answer to Herbert Spencer's "Unknowable," it cannot be accurately said that, according to the Persian view of the world, there is nothing but God. For, to say nothing of the apparently independent existence of the principle of darkness and evil called Ahriman, the relation of the Amshaspands, or supreme spirits, and of the Izeds, or secondary spirits, as well as of the Fereurs, or divine ideas to the impersonal Unity, seems to be rather that of emanations, than parts of a Whole. Again, if it be true that, according to the Zend Avesta, the conflict of light and darkness will ultimately cease, and Ahriman with his demons be annihilated, it is obvious that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>  



Top keywords:

Sidenote

 
supreme
 

Persian

 
religion
 

attain

 

Pantheistic

 
Buddhism
 

impersonal

 

spirits

 

boundless


Ahriman

 
darkness
 

accounts

 

Things

 

scarcely

 

justify

 

emanations

 
Parseeism
 

Aspect

 

Zoroaster


authorities

 

conflict

 

annihilated

 

Religions

 

strictly

 
obvious
 
heresy
 

proclaimed

 
immortal
 

demons


Divine
 

thinking

 

ultimately

 

Process

 
Avesta
 

principle

 

existence

 

called

 
nameless
 

independent


answer

 
accurately
 

Unknowable

 

Herbert

 

apparently

 
Spencer
 

divine

 
Fereurs
 

relation

 

goodness