FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>  
chish, after the taking of Ajalon by the Hebrews, but they say nothing of Makkedah. From the book of Joshua we learn that after the battle of Ajalon the Hebrews pursued to Azekah, perhaps the ruin of Zak, east of Gaza, and to Makkedah (x. 11), and then returned to Gilgal (15). An interval of unstated duration occurred, while the five kings, Adonizedek, Japhia, Hoham, Piram, and Debir (ver. 3), fled to Makkedah, where they were found hid in a cave. It was during this interval, apparently, that these Jerusalem letters were written. 324 The sign is unusual. The words are "icalu, ca-ar (Irhu) zabbatu," or perhaps "icalu-ca ar(unu) zabbatu." The latter would mean "They prevail over thee; they have been swift to seize." 325 "I have no father and no army." It either means this or "Have I no father and no friend?" It might refer to his father's death, or to the King of Egypt not being his father and friend. Dr. Sayce renders "neither father nor mother" ("SAL um" for "rag um"); but it is very unusual for orientals to refer to their female relations or wives, though in the case of the King of Accho (95 B.) the writer speaks of his wife; but this is for a special reason (see also 104 B.). 326 "'Abiri." This is read by others "Habiri" ("allies"); but the political circumstances do not agree with this explanation, and the sign is used throughout the letters for the guttural "'Ain" (as, for instance, in the name of Azzah or Gaza). There is no mention in the southern letters of Aziru, Abdasherah, Aitugama, or any of the northern allies; and the sign for "allies" or "helpers" in the northern letters is quite different. On the other hand, the 'Abiri are never mentioned, except in the south, near Jerusalem. They are called people of the "blood" or "tribe" of the 'Abiri (B. 106), and of the "land" of the 'Abiri (B. 199), showing that the term is derived from the 'Abarim, or mountains east of Jordan. The Abiru chiefs are mentioned in the singular (B. 102, 104), and none of these facts can be reconciled with the view that they were "allies." They are distinctly said to have come from Seir (Edom) in one letter (B. 104), and to have left their pastures (B. 103), and are probably the "desert people" of the Gezer letter (51 B. M.). Their actions
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>  



Top keywords:
father
 

allies

 
letters
 

Makkedah

 

zabbatu

 

mentioned

 
people
 

unusual

 
Jerusalem
 
northern

Ajalon

 

Hebrews

 

friend

 

letter

 

interval

 
guttural
 

instance

 

southern

 

distinctly

 

mention


explanation

 

special

 
reason
 

actions

 
circumstances
 

political

 
Habiri
 

Abdasherah

 

mountains

 
Abarim

Jordan
 

called

 

showing

 

desert

 

derived

 

chiefs

 

singular

 

helpers

 

reconciled

 

Aitugama


pastures

 

Adonizedek

 

Japhia

 
duration
 
occurred
 

apparently

 

unstated

 

Joshua

 

taking

 
battle