FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>  
justified to expect peace from the action of these socialists who stand by governments in the war is, as far as my own country is concerned, shown by the fact that the big meetings now (and, I am willing to admit, it is the intention of the initiators to hold them in favour of peace) led by the leaders of the majority of the social-democratic party, such as Messrs. Scheidemann, David, Ebert and others, turn out in practice as meetings in support of the policy of the government in regard to the question of war and peace. In order to defend their own political attitude the speakers are compelled to shift the responsibility for the war and its continuation wholly on the shoulders of the governments of the opposite countries and their supporters, and by this they increase in the mind of their hearers the conviction that nothing short of a defeat of these countries will bring the war to a desirable end. In England the majority of the Labour Party and a considerable number of the best known socialist leaders and in France the most influential leaders of socialist party support also the war policy of their respective governments in all principal issues. The well meant and praiseworthy attempts to convene a full International Socialist Congress for the purpose of settling these differences by finding a common line of action are, I am sorry to say, under the circumstances most likely to prove abortive. _They will founder on the self-contradiction that the Socialists of the Entente countries argue that their governments hate the idea of German militarism coming out unbeaten and unreduced out of this war which in their opinion was provoked by it, whilst the leaders of the German Socialists in power would rather see this same militarism which they in former years have so violently attacked and denounced, come out victorious than have it interfered with by outside influence._ In short, sections of the socialist movement will assist other forces in the action for peace, but the movement as a whole is incapable to act in the matter as a force of compelling strength. Help must in the main come from outside. Consequently President Wilson's action in his note to the belligerents of December 20th wo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>  



Top keywords:
leaders
 

governments

 

action

 

socialist

 

countries

 

German

 

majority

 

support

 

policy

 
Socialists

militarism

 

movement

 

meetings

 

whilst

 

unbeaten

 

opinion

 

unreduced

 
coming
 
provoked
 
common

finding

 

differences

 

Congress

 

purpose

 

settling

 

circumstances

 

contradiction

 

Entente

 
founder
 

abortive


victorious
 
strength
 

compelling

 
incapable
 
matter
 
Consequently
 

President

 

December

 
belligerents
 
Wilson

violently
 

attacked

 

denounced

 
Socialist
 
assist
 

forces

 

sections

 

influence

 

interfered

 

considerable