FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449  
450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   >>   >|  
sure that their purchases were "delivered." Those who intimidated voters could know when their intimidation was effective. In this way the party ballot strengthened the party machine. As a remedy for such abuses, reformers, learning from the experience of Australia, urged the adoption of the "Australian ballot." That ballot, though it appeared in many forms, had certain constant features. It was official, that is, furnished by the government, not by party workers; it contained the names of all candidates of all parties; it was given out only in the polling places; and it was marked in secret. The first state to introduce it was Massachusetts. The year was 1888. Before the end of the century it had been adopted by nearly all the states in the union. The salutary effect of the reform in reducing the amount of cheating and bribery in elections was beyond all question. =The Direct Primary.=--In connection with the uprising against machine politics, came a call for the abolition of the old method of nominating candidates by conventions. These time-honored party assemblies, which had come down from the days of Andrew Jackson, were, it was said, merely conclaves of party workers, sustained by the spoils system, and dominated by an inner circle of bosses. The remedy offered in this case was again "more democracy," namely, the abolition of the party convention and the adoption of the direct primary. Candidates were no longer to be chosen by secret conferences. Any member of a party was to be allowed to run for any office, to present his name to his party by securing signatures to a petition, and to submit his candidacy to his fellow partisans at a direct primary--an election within the party. In this movement Governor La Follette of Wisconsin took the lead and his state was the first in the union to adopt the direct primary for state-wide purposes. The idea spread, rapidly in the West, more slowly in the East. The public, already angered against "the bosses," grasped eagerly at it. Governor Hughes in New York pressed it upon the unwilling legislature. State after state accepted it until by 1918 Rhode Island, Delaware, Connecticut, and New Mexico were the only states that had not bowed to the storm. Still the results were disappointing and at that very time the pendulum was beginning to swing backward. =Popular Election of Federal Senators.=--While the movement for direct primaries was still advancing everywhere, a demand fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449  
450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

direct

 

ballot

 

primary

 

Governor

 

secret

 

states

 
adoption
 
candidates
 

workers

 

bosses


movement

 
abolition
 

remedy

 

machine

 
Candidates
 

convention

 

longer

 
offered
 

democracy

 

Follette


Wisconsin

 

election

 

member

 
securing
 

allowed

 
present
 

signatures

 

petition

 

conferences

 

chosen


partisans

 

fellow

 

submit

 

candidacy

 

office

 

grasped

 

disappointing

 

pendulum

 

beginning

 

results


Connecticut
 

Mexico

 

backward

 

Popular

 

advancing

 

demand

 

primaries

 

Election

 

Federal

 

Senators