FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
horized the issue of the following most significant instructions, in toto, a direct countermand of all that Sturgis had most prominently stood for: [Footnote 246: (cont.) organization of the Indians under way and have made a fine impression upon them, and I should very much regret any failure to carry out the programe as they have been allready so often disappointed that they have become suspicious and it all has a tendency to lessen their confidence in us and to greatly increase our dificulties All of which is most Respectfully Submitted by your obedient Servant W.G. COFFIN, Sup't of Indian Affairs. [Indian Office Special Files, no. 201, _Southern Superintendency_, C 1612 of 1862].] [Footnote 247: For an inferential appraisement of Ritchie's character and abilities, see Kansas _Historical Collections_, vol. iii, 359-366.] [Footnote 248: Ritchie to Dole, April 26, 1863 [Indian Office Miscellaneous Files, 1858-1863].] [Footnote 249: The reestablishment, considered in the light of the first orders issued by Blunt, those set out here, was decidedly in the nature of a reflection upon the reactionary policy of Halleck and Sturgis; but Halleck had no regrets. Of Kansas, he said, "Thank God, it is no longer under my command." [_Official Records_, vol. xiii, 440.] Ever since the time, when he had been urged by the administration in Washington, peculiarly sensitive to political importunities, not to retain, outside of Kansas, the Kansas troops if he could possibly avoid it, there had been more or less of rancor between him and them. His opinion of them was that they were a "humbug" [Ibid., vol. viii, 661].] [Footnote 250: Almost simultaneously, Schofield was given independent command in Missouri, a similar surrender to local political pressure.] [Footnote 251: _Official Records_, vol. xiii, 368-369.] General Orders, HDQRS. DEPARTMENT OF KANSAS, No. 2. Fort Leavenworth, Kans., May 5, 1862. I. General Orders, No. 8, dated Headquarters District of Kansas, April 25, 1862, is hereby rescinded. II. The instructions issued by the Department at Washington to the colonels of the two Indian regiments ordered to be raised will be fully carried out, and the regiments will be raised with all possible speed. By order of Brig. Gen. James G. Blunt,[252] THOS. MOONLIGHT, _Captain and Assistant Adjutant-general_.[253] The full extent, not only of Sturgis's failure to cooeperate
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Kansas

 
Indian
 

Sturgis

 
Ritchie
 
Office
 
command
 

Orders

 

General

 

regiments


raised

 

political

 

Washington

 

Halleck

 

Official

 

Records

 

issued

 

instructions

 

failure

 

Almost


simultaneously

 

Schofield

 

humbug

 

similar

 
direct
 
pressure
 

Missouri

 

surrender

 

independent

 

opinion


countermand

 
importunities
 
retain
 

troops

 

prominently

 

sensitive

 

administration

 

peculiarly

 

rancor

 
possibly

horized
 
carried
 

extent

 

cooeperate

 
general
 

MOONLIGHT

 

Captain

 

Assistant

 

Adjutant

 
Leavenworth