himself in his
wonderful allegory of the shadow-watchers in _The Republic_. The
trend of his argument is clear; as its shadow is to a solid object,
so is the object itself to its archetypal idea. This is the manner
in which he presents this thought:
"Imagine a number of men living in an underground cavernous chamber,
with an entrance open to the light, extending along the entire
length of the cavern, in which they have been confined, from their
childhood, with their legs and neck so shackled, that they are
obliged to sit still and look straight forwards, because their
chains render it impossible for them to turn their heads round: and
imagine a bright fire burning some way off, above and behind them,
and an elevated roadway passing between the fire and the prisoners,
with a low wall built along it, like the screens which conjurors put
up in front of their audience, and above which they exhibit their
wonders."
"I have it," he replied.
"Also, figure to yourself a number of persons walking behind this
wall, and carrying with them statues of men, and images of other
animals, wrought in wood, stone, and all kinds of materials, together
with various other articles, which overtop the wall; and, as you
might expect, let some of the passers-by be talking, and others
silent"
"You are describing a strange scene, and strange prisoners."
"They resemble us," I replied. "For let me ask you, in the first
place, whether persons so confined could have seen anything of
themselves or of each other, beyond the shadows thrown by the fire
upon the part of the cavern facing them."
"Certainly not, if you suppose them to have been compelled all their
lifetime to keep their heads unmoved."
"And is not their knowledge of the things carried past them equally
limited?"
"Unquestionably it is."
"And if they were able to converse with one another, do you not
think that they would be in the habit of giving names to the objects
which they saw before them?"
"Doubtless they would."
"Again: if their prison house returned an echo from the part facing
them, whenever one of the passers-by opened his lips, to what, let
me ask you, could they refer the voice, if not to the shadow which
was passing?"
"Unquestionably they would refer it to that."
"Then surely such persons would hold the shadows of the manufactured
articles to be the only realities."
"Without a doubt they would."
Plato (in the person of Socrates) then conside
|