FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363  
364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   >>   >|  
e perceptions." "To call a phenomenon a real thing antecedent to perception, means ... that in the _progress of experience_ we must meet with such a perception."] [Footnote 2: Phenomena "are altogether in me," "exist only in our sensibility as a modification of it." "There is nothing in space but that which is actually represented in it." Phenomena are "mere representations, which, if they are not given in us (in perception) nowhere exist."] [Footnote 3: Here Kant is guilty of the fault which he himself has censured, of confusing the physical and transcendental meanings of "in itself." He forgets that the thing, if it is momentarily not intuited or represented by me, and therefore is not immediately given for me as an individual, is nevertheless still present for me as man, is mediately given, that is, is discoverable by future search. That which is without my present consciousness is not for this reason without all human consciousness. In fact, Kant often overlooks the distinction between actual and possible intuition, so that for him the "objects" of the latter slip out of space and time and into the thing in itself. To the "transcendental object we may ascribe the extent and connection of our possible perceptions, and say that it is given in itself before all experience." In it "the real things of the past are given."] After the possibility and the legitimacy of synthetic judgments _a priori_ have been proved for pure mathematics upon the basis of the pure intuitions, there emerges, in the second place, the problem of the possibility of _a priori_ syntheses in pure natural science, or the question, Do pure concepts exist? And after this has been answered in the affirmative, the further questions come up, Is the application of these, first, to phenomena, and second, to things in themselves, possible and legitimate, and how far? %(b) The Concepts and Principles of the Pure Understanding (Transcendental Analytic).%--Sensations, in order to become "intuition" or the perception of a phenomenon, needed to be ordered in space and time; in order to become "experience" or a unified knowledge of objects, intuitions need a synthesis through concepts. In order to objective knowledge the manifold of intuition (already ordered by its arrangement in space and time) must be connected in the unity of the concept. Sensibility gives the manifold to be connected, the understanding the connecting unity. The former is able to intuit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363  
364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

perception

 

intuition

 

experience

 
ordered
 

transcendental

 
intuitions
 

things

 
priori
 

possibility

 
objects

present

 
consciousness
 
concepts
 
phenomenon
 

manifold

 
connected
 

Footnote

 

knowledge

 

Phenomena

 
perceptions

represented

 

science

 
syntheses
 

natural

 

Sensibility

 

concept

 

question

 

emerges

 

proved

 

mathematics


intuit

 

judgments

 

understanding

 
connecting
 

problem

 

Principles

 
objective
 

Concepts

 
Understanding
 

synthetic


needed

 
synthesis
 

Sensations

 
Transcendental
 

Analytic

 

questions

 
affirmative
 

unified

 

application

 

legitimate