FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   >>  
rises and falls in a cycle of eleven years? NIEMAND. The number of spots on the Sun rises and falls in a cycle of _about_ eleven years. That word _about_ makes quite a difference. LATHAM. In what way? NIEMAND. It means you can only approximately predict the future course of sunspot activity. Sunspots are mighty treacherous things. LATHAM. Haven't there been a great many correlations announced between sunspots and various effects on the Earth? NIEMAND. Scores of them. LATHAM. What is your opinion of these correlations? NIEMAND. Pure bosh in most cases. LATHAM. But some are valid? NIEMAND. A few. There is unquestionably a correlation between sunspots and disturbances of the Earth's magnetic field ... radio fade-outs ... auroras ... things like that. LATHAM. Now, Dr. Niemand, I understand that you have been investigating solar and terrestrial relationships along rather unorthodox lines. NIEMAND. Yes, I suppose some people would say so. LATHAM. You have broken new ground? NIEMAND. That's true. LATHAM. In what way have your investigations differed from those of others? NIEMAND. I think our biggest advance was the discovery that sunspots themselves are not the direct cause of the disturbances we have been studying on the Earth. It's something like the eruptions in rubeola. Attention is concentrated on the bright red papules because they're such a conspicuous symptom of the disease. Whereas the real cause is an invisible filterable virus. In the solar case it turned out to be these S-Regions. LATHAM. Why S-Regions? NIEMAND. We had to call them something. Named after the Sun, I suppose. LATHAM. You say an S-Region is invisible? NIEMAND. It is quite invisible to the eye but readily detected by suitable instrumental methods. It is extremely doubtful, however, if the radiation we detect is the actual cause of the disturbing effects observed. LATHAM. Just what are these effects? NIEMAND. Well, they're common enough, goodness knows. As old as the world, in fact. Yet strangely enough it's hard to describe them in exact terms. LATHAM. Can you give us a general idea? NIEMAND. I'll try. Let's see ... remember that speech from "Julius Caesar" where Cassius is bewailing the evil times that beset ancient Rome? I believe it went like this: "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves that we are underlings." LATHAM. I'm afraid I don't see-- NIEMAND. Well, Shakespe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   >>  



Top keywords:

NIEMAND

 

LATHAM

 
sunspots
 

effects

 

invisible

 
disturbances
 

suppose

 

eleven

 

things

 
Regions

correlations

 
radiation
 

turned

 

observed

 

disturbing

 
detect
 

actual

 

extremely

 

filterable

 

Region


readily
 

detected

 
methods
 

instrumental

 

suitable

 

doubtful

 

ancient

 
Caesar
 

Cassius

 

bewailing


afraid
 
Shakespe
 

underlings

 
Brutus
 

Julius

 

speech

 

strangely

 

goodness

 
describe
 
remember

general

 

common

 

opinion

 

Scores

 
magnetic
 

correlation

 

unquestionably

 

announced

 
approximately
 

difference