e seating of Henry B. Payne, of Ohio,
as a matter of right and without investigation. I was disposed to
vote for the taking of evidence and an investigation. When the
discussion was going on, I stated to Logan that I felt like voting
in favor of the investigation. He was very much out of humor about
it. I consulted with some friends in the Senate as to what I ought
to do under the circumstances, and they advised me, in view of
General Logan's personal feeling on the subject--and he felt that
he was personally involved--that I ought to vote with him.
After the vote was announced, I went around to General Logan's
seat, and he expressed intense gratification that I had voted with
him, remarking that if I had been involved in a struggle as he was,
he would take the roof off the house before he would let me be
beaten; and I believe he would have gone to almost any extent.
I then said to him: "General Logan, I want to assure you that
hereafter you must not feel concerned about my vote being the same
as yours. In other words, when I want to vote one way and you want
to vote another, I shall be perfectly satisfied, and shall have no
feeling against you on account of it; I want you to feel the same
way when conditions are reversed." He acquiesced in this proposal;
but we never afterwards had occasion to differ on any important
question before the Senate.
General Logan had an ambition to become President, and I believe
he would have realized his ambition had he lived.
I placed him in nomination for President at the National Convention
which met at Chicago in 1884. In _The Washington National Tribune_
appears the following report:
"The next State that responded was Illinois, and as Senator Cullom
mounted the platform to present the name of General John A. Logan,
cheer after cheer followed him. When he was at last allowed to
proceed, he began by referring to the nominations of Lincoln and
Grant, both from Illinois, and both nominated at Chicago:
'In 1880, the party, assembled again at Chicago, achieved success
by nominating Garfield; and now in 1884, in the same State, Illinois,
which has never wavered in its adherence to the Republican party,
presents, as the standard-bearer of that party, another son, one
whose name would be recognized from one end of the land to the
other as an able statesman, a brilliant soldier, and an honest man
--John A. Logan.'
"The announcement of General Logan's name was received
|