FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234  
235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   >>   >|  
ail it as a blessing. There are two reasons why we should leave these small native states under their own chiefs, even when the claim to the succession is feeble or defective; first, because it tends to relieve the minds of other native chiefs from the apprehension, already too prevalent among them, that we desire by degrees to absorb them all, because we think our government would do better for the people; and secondly, because, by leaving them as a contrast, we afford to the people of India the opportunity of observing the superior advantages of our rule. 'Tis distance lends enchantment to the view,' in governments as well as in landscapes; and if the people of India, instead of the living proofs of what perilous things native governments, whether Hindoo or Muhammadan, are in reality, were acquainted with nothing but such pictures of them as are to be found in their histories and in the imaginations of their priests and learned men (who lose much of their influence and importance under our rule), they would certainly, with proneness like theirs to delight in the marvellous, be far from satisfied, as they now are, that they never had a government so good as ours, and that they never could hope for another so good, were ours removed.[31] For the advantages which we derive from leaving them independent, we are, no doubt, obliged to pay a heavy penalty in the plunder of our wealthy native subjects by the gangs of robbers of all descriptions whom they foster; but this evil may be greatly diminished by a judicious interposition of our authority to put down such bands.[32] In Bundelkhand, at present, the government and the lands of the native chiefs are in the hands of three of the Hindoo military classes, Bundelas, Dhandelas, and Pawars. The principal chiefs are of the first, and their feudatories are chiefly of the other two. A Bundela cannot marry the daughter of a Bundela; he must take his wife from one or other of the other two tribes; nor can a member of either of the other two take his wife from his own tribe; he must take her from the Bundelas, or the other tribe. The wives of the greatest chiefs are commonly from the poorest families of their vassals; nor does the proud family from which she has been taken feel itself exalted by the alliance; neither does the poorest vassal among the Pawars and Dhandels feel that the daughter of his prince has condescended in becoming his wife. All they expect is a servic
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234  
235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
native
 

chiefs

 

people

 

government

 

advantages

 

leaving

 

Bundelas

 

Hindoo

 

Pawars

 
daughter

governments

 

Bundela

 

poorest

 

robbers

 

obliged

 

present

 

Bundelkhand

 
interposition
 
authority
 
penalty

diminished

 

greatly

 

subjects

 

foster

 

judicious

 

wealthy

 

plunder

 

descriptions

 
tribes
 

exalted


vassals
 
family
 

alliance

 
expect
 
servic
 
condescended
 

vassal

 

Dhandels

 
prince
 
families

commonly
 

chiefly

 

feudatories

 
principal
 
military
 

classes

 

Dhandelas

 

greatest

 

member

 

importance