FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87  
88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>   >|  
this fact seems originally to have arisen the notion that they were Egyptians. But this seems less like an assertion of their origin than like a piece of Scriptural phraseology. The Hussites used in that way a Biblical imagery, like the Puritans of a later age. Like the Puritans, they called their opponents Moabites, Amalekites, and so on. With the Puritans, Egypt was always "the house of bondage," and that name was the common designation of any place of persecution. Grellman refers to the name Polgar as Indian, and as common with the Gypsies; but he does not notice that the men in all the original Gypsy parties bore such sufficiently Christian appellations as Michael, Andrew, John, and Peter. _Rommany_ is the Gypsy name for a Gypsy, and this is referred to the Sanscrit _Rama_, man, by one author, and by others to the Coptic _Rom_. Either is possible, but sufficiently remote. By the kind of deception referred to above, which made the Gypsies call themselves Catholics when in Catholic countries, it is probable that they may sometimes have gone so far as to say that they were Romans,--that is, adherents of Rome,--and habit may have fastened the name. This derivation is as good as either of the others. But the language of the Gypsies has been most relied upon to prove their derivation from Hindostan, both by Grellman and Borrow. Remarkable similarities have been shown to exist between the Hindoo dialects and the Gypsy tongue. But the argument of language is better for Bohemian than for Hindoo origin. The Bohemians were Cechs, a branch of the great Slavic race of undoubted Asiatic origin; and the Cech language descended from the Sanscrit almost as directly as the Hindoo dialects did. Here is a good reason why the Hindoo dialects and the Gypsy tongue--if the Gypsies were Bohemians--should closely resemble one another. They were from the same parent stem. The learned Buesching said, "The Gypsy language is a mixture of corrupt words from the Wallachian, Slavonian, Hungarian, and other nations." These are the cognate languages of the Slavic race, all descended from the same source, and that also the source of the Cech. The first list of Gypsy words ever made was cited to prove an Egyptian origin, and they were Slavic. That was, perhaps, the best list ever made, as later ones show the results of the use of the languages of the various lands in which the Gypsies wander. The complexion, habits, and character of the Gypsies re
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87  
88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Gypsies

 
Hindoo
 
origin
 

language

 
Puritans
 
dialects
 
Slavic
 

Sanscrit

 

referred

 

sufficiently


Grellman
 

derivation

 

tongue

 

Bohemians

 
descended
 
languages
 

common

 

source

 

Bohemian

 
argument

results
 

undoubted

 

branch

 

Asiatic

 
complexion
 

habits

 

originally

 
character
 

relied

 
Hindostan

similarities
 

Borrow

 

Remarkable

 

wander

 

mixture

 
corrupt
 

Wallachian

 

Buesching

 

learned

 
Slavonian

nations

 

Hungarian

 

parent

 

reason

 
cognate
 

directly

 

Egyptian

 
resemble
 

closely

 

Romans