FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
olored man arrested was the person intended in the warrant, and named Shadrach. The Commissioner again held that the returns on the warrant were _prima facie_ evidence that the man arrested was the said Shadrach. Mr. Dana thought Mr. Riley had destroyed the presumption arising from the return by having testified that he did not personally know whether the man was Shadrach or not; all he could say was that he knew he was the man he had arrested as Shadrach. Col. Thomas was allowed to testify, that the man arrested and brought into the court room was claimed by Caphart as Shadrach. When he came into the room Caphart said, "This is my boy." Col. Thomas produced a paper and testified to it as the power of attorney. Objected to on the ground that the signature was not proved. The Commissioner held that it was admissible as one of the papers before Mr. Curtis. _Simpson Clark_, recalled. _Mr. Lunt._ I propose to show that Shadrach admitted he was a slave, and owned by De Bree, and that his name was Shadrach. _Mr. Dana._ It is true the Commissioner has admitted Col. Thomas to testify to the declaration of De Bree's agent, as evidence that De Bree claimed the man; but this evidence is still more remote. This is a criminal prosecution. Is a man to be bound by statements of others? This matter was not adjudicated. How can the man's admission that his name is Shadrach affect us? He is not placed upon the stand. He is not under oath. His admission is that his name is Shadrach, not that he is a slave. Moreover, the act provides that the party claimed shall not be received as a witness. _The Commissioner._ An alleged fugitive is only excluded from being a witness in the case of a complaint against himself as a fugitive. This does not exclude his admissions in the case of a criminal trial of another party. His admission is the best possible evidence of identity under the act. See Law in Appendix, Sec. 6. ["In all proceedings under this act"] _Mr. Clark._ Am a constable. Am employed specially. After the man was brought in, he asked who it was that claimed him. He first asked me, and I referred him to Mr. Sawin. Mr. Sawin named one person to him, and he said he did not know him. Mr. Sawin then named another person to him, and he said he did not know him. He then said he was named Shadrach, and commenced to tell me the circumstances of his coming away, but I advised him not to speak to me about it, as I might be made a witn
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Shadrach
 

arrested

 

claimed

 

evidence

 

Commissioner

 

Thomas

 
admission
 

person

 

witness

 

Caphart


criminal

 

admitted

 

fugitive

 

warrant

 
testify
 

testified

 

brought

 

complaint

 

admissions

 

exclude


excluded
 

thought

 

Moreover

 
received
 
alleged
 

identity

 

referred

 

intended

 

olored

 

coming


advised

 

circumstances

 

commenced

 

specially

 

Appendix

 

constable

 

employed

 
returns
 

proceedings

 

destroyed


recalled

 

Simpson

 
Curtis
 
papers
 

propose

 

allowed

 
admissible
 

produced

 
signature
 

proved