FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   >>  
r couples returned in April 1972, the answers were resoundingly in the affirmative. In one case, it was true, the local arrangements had broken down and they had not had the opportunity yet to conduct a retreat--but they came to the reunion just the same. (Their opportunity for leadership came later.) Reports from all the others, including the two "veteran" couples, had the same authentic ring of success that had been sounded so unmistakably a year earlier. Quoting from the group: "We felt our job was to provide some structure to help the experience develop, and then let people sort it out for themselves. Both of us felt it was most important to ride with the tone of the developing situation, and avoid any use of the more aggressive techniques of confrontation. Stan was worried on Saturday that the talk was too general. Then one of the wives broke through by asking if we could discuss something "... down here, where I am ... like SEX?" So we got there ..." "We viewed our task as leaders to be one of creating and sustaining an atmosphere in which each couple could speak personally concerning their marriage. We felt we best accomplished this task when we participated as a couple in the same way as we urged the others to participate." "We regarded ourselves as facilitators. We tried to be creative listeners; to put questions to the group that would help them to share personal experiences; to bring about a change of pace when we sensed this to be necessary." "We were quite relaxed. We tried to be perceptive of the needs of individual couples. We hope we didn't talk too much." "We saw ourselves as equal participants with the others, and facilitators of a process which started well with frank, meaningful conversation. We did agenda-building at several points. Our aim was to create an atmosphere in which defensiveness could be replaced with tolerant acceptance, and trust and confidence could grow as we heard each other and learned from each other." THE PROBLEM OF UNFELT NEED "The underlying problem is the fact that the marriage enrichment retreat meets unfelt needs. People don't feel keenly that they need it. If you think your marriage is sound, you aren't strongly motivated to spend a weekend making it even sounder. To get the tingle of a potential deepening and enriching takes emotional impact. This means hearing from someone obviously sensible who is warmly convinced about it." A number of theories were
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   >>  



Top keywords:

couples

 

marriage

 
facilitators
 

opportunity

 

couple

 
atmosphere
 

retreat

 

started

 

points

 

conversation


create
 

process

 
building
 

agenda

 

meaningful

 

defensiveness

 

relaxed

 
sensed
 

change

 

experiences


personal

 
perceptive
 

questions

 

individual

 

participants

 
underlying
 

tingle

 
potential
 
enriching
 

deepening


sounder
 

motivated

 

strongly

 

weekend

 

making

 

emotional

 
warmly
 

convinced

 

theories

 

number


impact

 

hearing

 

PROBLEM

 
UNFELT
 
learned
 

acceptance

 

tolerant

 

confidence

 

listeners

 

problem