FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   >>  
f a President of the United States should be subjected, upon occasion, to a like scrutiny. The process was tried and found useful in the Capitol of Wisconsin, and, for similar reasons, it may be tried and found useful in the Capitol of the Union. So far from degrading the office, or offending the people to whom the office belongs, it can but help to make fraud less defiant and right more safe, and add a new crown to the majesty of law. That triumph of peace and justice in Wisconsin has, to the eye of reason, given an added glory to her prairies and hills, and a brighter light to the waters of her shining lakes. APPENDIX. _Observations of the Chief Justice Whiton, of Wisconsin, respecting the force of a certificate of canvassers:_ "Before proceeding to state our views in regard to the law regulating the canvass of votes by the State canvassers, we propose to consider how far the right of a person to an office is affected by the determination of the canvassers of the votes cast at the election held to choose the officer. Under our constitution, almost all our officers are elected by the people. Thus the Governor is chosen, the constitution providing that the person having the highest number of votes for that office shall be elected. But the constitution is silent as to the mode in which the election shall be conducted, and the votes cast for Governor shall be canvassed and the result of the election ascertained. The duty of prescribing the mode of conducting the election, and of canvassing the votes was, therefore, devolved upon the Legislature. They have accordingly made provision for both, and the question is, whether the canvass, or the election, establishes the right of a person to an office. It seems clear that it cannot be the former, because by our constitution and laws it is expressly provided that the election by the qualified voters shall determine the question. To hold that the canvass shall control, would subvert the foundations upon which our government rests. But it has been repeatedly contended in the course of this proceeding that, although the election by the electors determines the right to the office, yet the decision of the persons appointed to canvass the votes cast at the election, settles finally and completely the question as to the persons elected, and that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   >>  



Top keywords:

election

 

office

 

constitution

 

canvass

 

person

 

question

 

canvassers

 

elected

 

Wisconsin

 
Capitol

people
 

proceeding

 

Governor

 
persons
 

prescribing

 

devolved

 
Legislature
 

canvassing

 
conducting
 

providing


President
 

chosen

 

officers

 

highest

 

canvassed

 

result

 

conducted

 

silent

 

number

 

ascertained


repeatedly

 

contended

 

subvert

 
foundations
 

government

 

settles

 

finally

 
completely
 

appointed

 
decision

electors
 
determines
 

control

 

establishes

 

determine

 

voters

 

qualified

 

expressly

 
provided
 

provision