FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   >>  
t whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have eternal life."[9] Beneath all differences of condition, of intellect, of culture, there is a common soul which the Gospel reaches, and which nothing else in the same manner reaches. Now, in contrast to all this, the contents of any special theology commend themselves to a comparatively few minds. And such hold as they have over these minds is for the most part traditionary and authoritative, not rational or intelligent. There can be no vital experience of theological definitions, and no verification of them, except in the few minds who have really examined them, and brought them into the light of their own intelligence. This must always be the work of a few--of what are called schools of thought, here and there. It is only the judgment of the learned or thoughtful theologian that is really of any value on a theological question. Others may assent or dissent. He alone knows the conditions of the question and its possible solution. Of all the absurdities that have come from the confusion of religion and theology, none is more absurd or more general than the idea that one opinion on a theological question--any more than on a question of natural science--is as good as another. The opinion of the ignorant, of the unthoughtful, of the undisciplined in Christian learning, is simply of no value whatever where the question involves--as it may be said every theological question involves--knowledge, thought, and scholarship. The mere necessity of such qualities for working the theological sphere, and turning it to any account, places it quite apart from the religious sphere. The one belongs to the common life of humanity, the other to the school of the prophets. The one is for you and for me, and for all human beings; the other is for the expert--the theologian--who has weighed difficulties and who understands them, if he has not solved them. III. But again, religion differs from theology in the comparative uniformity of its results. The ideal of religion is almost everywhere the same. "To do justly, to love mercy, to walk humbly with God."[10] "Pure religion" (or pure religious service) "and undefiled, before God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."[11] Where is it not always the true, even if not the prevalent type of religion, to be good and pure, and to approve the things tha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   >>  



Top keywords:

question

 

religion

 

theological

 

theology

 
religious
 

opinion

 

common

 

sphere

 

theologian

 

reaches


involves

 

thought

 

prophets

 
prevalent
 
humanity
 
school
 

belongs

 

knowledge

 

things

 

approve


simply

 

learning

 

undisciplined

 
Christian
 

qualities

 

working

 
turning
 
account
 

necessity

 
scholarship

places
 

humbly

 
justly
 

service

 
unspotted
 

widows

 

fatherless

 
undefiled
 

Father

 

affliction


solved

 
understands
 

difficulties

 

beings

 
expert
 

weighed

 

results

 

uniformity

 
comparative
 

differs