FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146  
147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>   >|  
wer jaw of _Homo primigenius_. (Schoetensack, _Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensis_, Leipzig, 1908.) G. S.] [Footnote 119: _Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley_, Vol. II. p. 394.] [Footnote 120: _Descent of Man_, p. 229.] [Footnote 121: _Loc. cit._] [Footnote 122: Klaatsch in his last publications speaks in the main only of an ancestral form common to men and anthropoid apes.] [Footnote 123: Haeckels latest genealogical tree is to be found in his most recent work, _Unsere Ahnenreihe_. Jena, 1908.] [Footnote 124: Sergi, G. _Europa_, 1908.] [Footnote 125: _See_ Ameghino's latest paper, "_Notas preliminaries sobre el Tetraprothomo argentinus_," etc. _Anales del Museo nacional de Buenos Aires_, XVI. pp. 107-242, 1907.] [Footnote 126: "Nouvelles recherches sur la formation pampeenne et l'homme fossile de la Republique Argentine." _Rivista del Museo de la Plata_, T. XIV. pp. 193-488.] V CHARLES DARWIN AS AN ANTHROPOLOGIST BY ERNST HAECKEL _Professor of Zoology in the University of Jena_ The great advance that anthropology has made in the second half of the nineteenth century is due, in the first place, to Darwin's discovery of the origin of man. No other problem in the whole field of research is so momentous as that of "Man's place in nature," which was justly described by Huxley (1863) as the most fundamental of all questions. Yet the scientific solution of this problem was impossible until the theory of descent had been established. It is now a hundred years since the great French biologist Jean Lamarck published his _Philosophie Zoologique_. By a remarkable coincidence the year in which that work was issued, 1809, was the year of the birth of his most distinguished successor, Charles Darwin. Lamarck had already recognised that the descent of man from a series of other Vertebrates--that is, from a series of Ape-like Primates--was essentially involved in the general theory of transformation which he had erected on a broad inductive basis; and he had sufficient penetration to detect the agencies that had been at work in the evolution of the erect bimanous man from the arboreal and quadrumanous ape. He had, however, few empirical arguments to advance in support of his hypothesis, and it could not be established until the further development of the biological sciences--the founding of comparative embryology by Baer (1828) and of the cell-theory by Schleiden and Schwann (1838),
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146  
147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

theory

 

latest

 
Darwin
 

advance

 

problem

 

Lamarck

 

established

 
descent
 

series


Huxley

 
sciences
 

biological

 
development
 

impossible

 

questions

 

scientific

 
solution
 

hundred

 

French


research

 
Schleiden
 

discovery

 

origin

 

Schwann

 

founding

 
justly
 

biologist

 
comparative
 

nature


momentous

 

embryology

 

fundamental

 

hypothesis

 
involved
 
bimanous
 
general
 

arboreal

 

essentially

 

Primates


quadrumanous

 

transformation

 
evolution
 

agencies

 

sufficient

 

penetration

 
inductive
 

erected

 

Vertebrates

 

arguments