FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  
rations; a _monstrous coalition_ had taken place between a noble Lord and an illustrious commoner--the lofty asserter of the prerogative had joined in an alliance with the worshippers of the majesty of the people." Such words had more purpose and meaning in those days than they would have in our own, and the startling antithesis rang through a debate as remarkable for invective on the one side, as for the confession of weakness on the other. Mr. Grenville and Lord Bulkeley communicated the issue to Lord Temple, in the following hasty notes. MR. W. W. GRENVILLE TO LORD TEMPLE. Feb. 18th, 1783, Ten, A.M. My dear Brother, I write these few lines by a messenger, to let you know that this morning, at seven o'clock, after a debate of fifteen hours, the House of Commons divided: 209 for the original Address upon the peace, and 224 for the Amendment. The Address was very cautiously worded, and by no means conveyed any strong approbation. The Amendment was merely to assure His Majesty that we _will_ consider the preliminaries, and in the meantime we consider ourselves bound strictly to adhere to the articles to which, by the ratification, the national faith is pledged; with something about the loyalists. The Address was moved and seconded by T. Pitt and Wilberforce; the Amendment, by Lord John Cavendish and St. Andrew St. John. Lord North spoke next to them, in approbation of it. Fox avowed the coalition with Lord North, and was a good deal attacked upon it, particularly by Powis. Tom, to my infinite joy, did not speak. Jemmy spoke. Rigby spoke and voted with us. In the House of Lords, the Amendment was a strong censure: this was rejected, 69 to 55. Where this is to end, God knows! _Je n'en scai rien._ I am too much fatigued to be able to give you any particulars of the debate. Adieu. Ever yours, W. W. G. LORD BULKELEY TO LORD TEMPLE. Berkeley Square, Tuesday Night, Feb. 18th, 1783. My dear Lord Temple, I conclude your brother William, and Jemmy Grenville, have given you exact accounts of the strange politics of the present moment. By a junction formed between Lord North and Fox, on Sunday evening last, the Address in our House was not carried; but the Amendment was, 224 to 208. The landed property was mostly with Government, and for the Address. The
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Address

 
Amendment
 

debate

 

Grenville

 

Temple

 

TEMPLE

 
approbation
 
strong
 

coalition

 

Sunday


formed

 

junction

 

attacked

 

evening

 

avowed

 
moment
 

infinite

 
present
 

carried

 

Cavendish


loyalists

 

Government

 

Wilberforce

 
property
 

Andrew

 

politics

 

pledged

 

landed

 
seconded
 

BULKELEY


Tuesday

 

Square

 
Berkeley
 

particulars

 

fatigued

 

accounts

 
strange
 
William
 

censure

 

conclude


brother
 

rejected

 

remarkable

 

invective

 

antithesis

 

startling

 

confession

 
communicated
 

weakness

 
Bulkeley