rds 'Our Father,' were admirably suited to the comprehension and
needs of the simple country people.
For several months during 1895 he took charge of a small country parish
near Cambridge, called Toft. While staying at Toft he wrote to a
friend, 'I like living among country folk and talking with {26} and
visiting them. I want to get out of my life into their lives. This
parish work humiliates if it does not humble one. . . . The smallest
parish is a tremendous responsibility.'
The following are a few additional notes contributed by others who knew
Forbes at Christ's: 'His broad sympathies, his unfailing efforts to
find out the good in persons and systems--the rays of truth which each
possessed--combined with the rare faculty of going deep down beneath
vexed questions, and thus lifting controversies to a higher and serener
atmosphere: these were qualities in him which were known especially by
those privileged to have more intimate knowledge of him than that
vouchsafed by formal lectures or social gatherings. . . . He is now
another link with the life beyond these conflicting voices, one "who
loved Heaven's silence more than fame."'
The same writer says of him in another letter: 'His extreme fairness
and toleration, which at first seemed to me to reduce half one's
cherished beliefs to open questions, was of the greatest value in
dispelling ignorance and prejudice, and in promoting true charity and a
more intelligent faith. He delighted to call attention to the fact
that our Lord found something commendable and exemplary in the serpent.
And so, in dealing with those with whom he most disagreed, he tried to
fix attention on that portion of truth which lay behind their opinions,
or on those real difficulties, to be slighted only by {27} the
superficial, with which they were grappling. Tertullian, with his love
of scoring off opponents, fared badly at his hands, and he used to
treat Clement of Alexandria more sympathetically than Irenaeus.
'It was striking to find a mind so evenly balanced and philosophical
become fired with enthusiasm as he spoke in simplest language, in
chapel or elsewhere, of great Christian truths or the victories of
faith. His sermons influenced, I believe, many of the naturally
careless. Simple, impartial, earnest and sympathetic, he won, I know,
the deepest affection and respect of many.'
Another writes: 'Bright, pure, and strong--this was the impression he
gave me . . . . Many me
|