FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2185   2186   2187   2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209  
2210   2211   2212   2213   2214   2215   2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   >>   >|  
an account of the state of the colony according to the latest advices received from thence; endeavouring to show that the settlers and the natives generally were on good terms, and that there was no fear of a collision between them. He concluded by entering into a consideration of the resolutions, and by declaring that government would not consent to them. The debate was then adjourned, and on the following day it was resumed by Captain Rous, who brought some grave charges against the New Zealand Company. He did so, he said, for the purpose of giving the directors of that company, who had been described as philanthropic gentlemen, an opportunity of replying to those charges. Mr. Aglionby, in reply, protested against them; but declined to enter into a refutation of them on the present occasion: the details of them all had been inquired into in the previous session by the select committee, and on every one of them a verdict of acquittal had been given by that committee. Other members who took part in the debate for the motion were Lords Howick and John Russell, and Messrs. Ellice, Hawes, Mangles, Colquhoun, and Shiel; against it, Sirs Robert Peel, James Graham, Robert Inglis, and Howard Douglas and Mr. Cardwell. After a brief reply from Mr. Buller, the house divided on the motion, which was negatived by a majority of two hundred and twenty-three against one hundred and seventeen. Towards the end of the session the New Zealand question again became the subject of a lengthened investigation. Intelligence continued to be received from New Zealand of the hostile disposition and violent conduct of the natives, and the precarious tenure on which the lives and properties of the settlers depended. Under these circumstances, on the 21st of July, a petition was presented by the New Zealand Company, praying the house "not to separate without taking measures calculated to allay the apprehensions prevalent among the colonists of New Zealand, and to revive confidence in the company, by which its usefulness would be restored, the friendly communication between the colonists and the aboriginal races renewed, and the prosperity of New Zealand secured." On the same day Mr. C. Buller proposed a resolution to the effect, that "the house regarded with regret and apprehension the state of affairs in New Zealand, and that those feelings were greatly aggravated by the want of any sufficient evidence of a change in the policy which had led to s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2185   2186   2187   2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209  
2210   2211   2212   2213   2214   2215   2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Zealand

 
charges
 

debate

 

motion

 

hundred

 

Robert

 

Buller

 

committee

 

company

 

session


colonists

 

Company

 

natives

 

received

 

settlers

 

continued

 

sufficient

 

violent

 

evidence

 

disposition


hostile

 

conduct

 

tenure

 

circumstances

 

depended

 

properties

 

precarious

 

Intelligence

 
change
 

policy


twenty

 

majority

 
negatived
 

divided

 

seventeen

 

subject

 

lengthened

 

Towards

 

question

 

investigation


usefulness

 

restored

 
effect
 

friendly

 

regarded

 
confidence
 

communication

 

aboriginal

 

secured

 
prosperity