FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125  
1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   >>   >|  
ssenters, it being considered liable to be perverted to purposes of intolerance. It encountered, indeed, such a storm of opposition, and the house was so inundated with petitions, that when it came to be read a second time it was rejected without a division. AFFAIRS OF THE IRISH CATHOLICS. It was generally understood among the Irish Catholics that the prince regent was favourable to their claims, and his investment with power contributed to increase their activity and zeal. Among other measures, they proposed to establish a committee in Dublin, composed of delegates from each country, for the management of their affairs. But this was deemed unlawful by government; and Mr. Wellesley Pole, the Irish secretary, sent a circular-letter to all the sheriffs and county magistrates, requiring them to arrest all persons engaged in such elections. This letter being brought before parliament excited much discussion; and on the 3rd of March Mr. Pole, having returned from Ireland, stated in explanation that the Catholic committee of 1809, had confined their deliberations to petitioning, whereas the delegates of 1810 were empowered to manage the affairs of the Catholics generally; and that a committee of grievances, which met weekly, imitated all the forms of the house of commons. The opinion of the great law-officers, he said, had been taken by the lord-lieutenant, and the attorney-general had drawn up the circular. This explanation had a due effect noon the house; for when the petition which had been prepared by the committee was presented, although it was supported by the eloquence of Grattan, it was rejected by a majority of one hundred and forty-six against eighty-three. It shared the same fate in the lords, it being thought dangerous to grant any power to men who would be likely to abuse it. The rejection of this petition caused great disturbances in Ireland. AMENDMENT OF THE CRIMINAL LAW Among the various statutes of this session there were two which tended to diminish, in the instances of stealing linen and cotton from fields and out-buildings, that long list of offences to which our law assigned the punishment of death. Three other bills, having a similar tendency were passed in the commons, but were rejected by the lords. All these bills were brought in by that enlightened legislator, Sir Samuel Romilly. PROROGATION OF PARLIAMENT. Parliament was prorogued on the 24th of July by commission. The
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125  
1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

committee

 

rejected

 
affairs
 

generally

 

delegates

 

Ireland

 

Catholics

 
explanation
 

commons

 

brought


letter

 

circular

 

petition

 

dangerous

 
thought
 

eloquence

 

effect

 

prepared

 

general

 

lieutenant


attorney

 

presented

 
eighty
 
hundred
 
supported
 

Grattan

 
majority
 

shared

 
statutes
 
passed

tendency
 

similar

 
assigned
 
punishment
 

enlightened

 

legislator

 
prorogued
 
commission
 

Parliament

 
PARLIAMENT

Samuel

 

Romilly

 

PROROGATION

 

offences

 

CRIMINAL

 

session

 
AMENDMENT
 

disturbances

 
rejection
 

caused