FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466  
467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   >>   >|  
o be wished. The amendment was negatived by eighty-two against forty-one. A similar amendment to that of the Marquess of Rockingham, was moved in the commons by Lord John Cavendish. In both houses, also, the arguments and invectives employed were allied in character. The ministers were accused of ruining both army and navy by their compliances with court predilections; by their fear and jealousy of every officer of merit; by their criminal tardiness; and by their want of a consistent plan of military operations. Charles Fox went a step further than most of the speakers in opposition. He declared that treachery and not ignorance must have prevailed in the national councils, to reduce the nation to so miserable a condition; and he warned ministers that when the nation was reduced to such a state of wretchedness and distraction that the laws of the land could afford no relief, the law of nature would put arms into the hands of the people, and then they, who had caused the evil, would suffer for their mal-administration. In reply, Lord North indignantly denied that any treachery was resorted to by ministers, and called upon the opposition to stand forth like men, and make good such vague accusations. Laws, he said, existed for the protection of the innocent; and if his accusers adhered to the laws, he had nothing to fear. Lord North, also, defended with considerable ingenuity the management of the war; asserting that, from its extensive nature, it was impossible to keep a force superior to the enemy at every point; and affirming that the fleets of France and Spain, which had been raised to the ruin of their finances, had gained neither honour nor advantage, and were already falling into weakness and decrepitude. The amendment was negatived by two hundred and thirty-three against one hundred and thirty-four. LORD SHELBURNE ATTACKS MINISTERS IN THE CASE OF IRELAND. Although Ireland had been misgoverned for centuries, yet opposition, in the course of these debates attributed every mischief in that country to the present ministers. In both houses assurances were given that satisfactory plans of relief were in contemplation, but even then opposition were not disarmed. Having procured a summons of the house, on the 1st of December the Earl of Shelburne moved a resolution, declaring ministers highly censurable for having neglected to take measures for the relief of Ireland, in conformity with the address of the lords to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466  
467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ministers

 

opposition

 

amendment

 

relief

 

nation

 

hundred

 
thirty
 
nature
 

treachery

 

Ireland


houses

 
negatived
 

adhered

 

gained

 
decrepitude
 

finances

 

innocent

 
defended
 

honour

 

advantage


falling

 

accusers

 

considerable

 
weakness
 

raised

 
superior
 

asserting

 

impossible

 

extensive

 

management


ingenuity

 

France

 

fleets

 

affirming

 

summons

 

December

 

procured

 

Having

 

contemplation

 

disarmed


Shelburne
 

measures

 

conformity

 

address

 

neglected

 

resolution

 

declaring

 

highly

 

censurable

 

satisfactory