FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>  
live under the protec^n. of a Const^n. & yet _refuse_ to submit to its _stipulations_. True enough, as you say, the North wish _not_ to have the Negroes set free _in their midst_, to overrun and disturb them--this they declare by their actions, for they take no care for or interest in the poor free (almost) brutes in their midst;--yet how soon will they be ready to _resist_ you most violently should you attempt to take even one of them back, from his then wretched abode, to his former happier place in the service of a kind Master? "Oh! consistency, thou art a jewel!" This then has been _one_ of the _two great causes_ of the present troubles. The other--the denial of equal rights in the Territories--is still a _greater_, because it involves a principle; the former was more a matter of personal interest. The territories being purchased in common, were the com. pos. of North and South. Each had a Const^l right to emigrate thither _with their property_ & demand for it the protection _afforded by_ the Const^n. It became, in course of time, a matter of dispute whether the South could take their slaves there as _property_. (As a matter of course this arose from _jealousy_--the N. having no such prop, to take.) This great quest. was decided, however, by the _Chief Justice_ in the highest Tribunal in the world, in favor of the South; viz. that _slaves were property_. I refer to the "Dred Scott" Case. This should have been sufficient, as it came from the highest authority in the Gov^t. But some parties and people are _never satisfied_. Full in the face of this high official the Repub^n Party declare by their _Platform orators, & Press_, that slavery shall never enter another foot of territory. Now if the South admit this principle they acknowledge their inferiority to the North--an act that, even in the eyes of the North, would not comport with their dignity & honor as an independent & free people. The South being thus _oppressed_ then I assert they have a right (not to secede, for no such right exists in my conception, as it would be an element _subversive_ of any, & especially of a Repub^ln gov.,) _to revolt_--a right inherent in & beyond the control of all earthly govern^ts. Yes I coincide with the great Lord Chatham when he says that "_Rebellion_ against _oppression_ is _obedience_ to _God_." Our Ancestors rebelled against the tyranny of British usurpation, & the Texans revolted against a like despotism exercised by a Mexican
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>  



Top keywords:

property

 

matter

 

principle

 
people
 
interest
 

slaves

 
declare
 

highest

 

authority

 

territory


sufficient
 

acknowledge

 

parties

 

satisfied

 

official

 
Platform
 

slavery

 

orators

 

subversive

 
Rebellion

oppression

 
obedience
 

Chatham

 

coincide

 

revolted

 

despotism

 

exercised

 
Mexican
 

Texans

 

usurpation


Ancestors

 

rebelled

 

tyranny

 

British

 

govern

 

earthly

 

oppressed

 

assert

 

secede

 

exists


independent

 

comport

 

dignity

 

conception

 

inherent

 

revolt

 
control
 

element

 

inferiority

 

demand