FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>   >|  
e corporations do not ruin the citizens with their own money but only with money borrowed on their credit--as if the one were not identical with the other. The objections to municipal enterprise on a Socialist basis are twofold: (1) That it increases the rates and the municipal debt, and therefore the rent of houses and lodgings; (2) That it is, on the whole, unprofitable, being undertaken without due regard to sound finance, efficiency, and economy. Socialists intend to "tax the rich out of existence." Therefore they endeavour to increase as much as possible not only the Imperial taxation but also the rates. Owners of house property are used to a certain income. If the rates are put up, they put up the rent. Therefore every increase in the rates leads, as a rule, automatically to an equivalent increase in the rent. The fact that a rise in the rates leads to a rise in the rent of houses and lodgings, and that the Socialist policy of waste and squander falls therefore most heavily not on the capitalist but on the working man, is boldly denied. "Generally speaking, the reduction of rates is of no benefit whatever to the working class. Rates are levied upon property.--Q. Do not the working class pay the rates and taxes? A. No. Rates and taxes are paid out of the surplus value taken from the workers by their exploiters. As already explained, the return to the workers, their wages, is determined by their cost of subsistence, regulated by competition in the labour market; consequently they have nothing wherewith to pay taxes, and whether these be high or low, or whoever has to pay them directly, the position of the worker remains the same. He gets, on the average, his subsistence, that is all."[677] Unfortunately, many working men know to their cost that the arguments given above are absolutely untrue. Whilst their wages have remained stationary, their expenditure for rent has greatly increased owing to municipal enterprise carried on by Socialists regardless of expense, which has greatly increased rates. At West Ham "Local government was to be carried on in a way regardless of expense, and under the compounding system the vast majority of the electors were not to realise that there were such things as rates at all. One member of the Socialist party publicly declared that it did not matter to the working men of the borough how high the rates were. But the 'people' got to see in course of time that there were drawba
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
working
 

Socialist

 

municipal

 

increase

 

Therefore

 

expense

 

property

 

carried

 

increased

 
greatly

Socialists

 

houses

 

lodgings

 

subsistence

 

workers

 

enterprise

 

Unfortunately

 
labour
 
regulated
 
average

competition

 

drawba

 

wherewith

 

directly

 

worker

 

market

 

position

 

remains

 
remained
 

electors


realise
 
majority
 

compounding

 
system
 
things
 
declared
 

member

 

borough

 
matter
 
untrue

Whilst
 

publicly

 

people

 
absolutely
 
arguments
 

stationary

 

expenditure

 

government

 

finance

 

efficiency