FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   >>  
's Court and bringing an offending child up on an offence can best be illustrated by what happened in the cases of carnal knowledge and indecent assault which were brought prominently to the notice of the public recently. The offending boys were charged under those sections of the Crimes Act which prescribed maximum penalties of five or seven years imprisonment. In most cases convictions were recorded and the boys were admonished and discharged; in a few cases the charges were dismissed; in other cases the boys were committed to the care of the Superintendent or placed under the supervision of a Child Welfare Officer. The girls, not having committed a breach of the Crimes Act or any other statute, could not be charged. Their parents were, in appropriate cases, summoned to Court upon the complaint that they had the custody of a "delinquent", or a child not under proper control. That the above distinction is not merely a formal one is shown by the fact that an offending boy's name, and the decision of the Court regarding him, is always recorded in the _Police Gazette_. As the girl is not charged as an offender her name is not so recorded, even although (as shown in Section V (2) of this report) it may have been the misbehaviour of the girl which led the boy into the commission of the offence charged against him. When a sophisticated girl entices a boy into the commission of an offence it is anomalous[7] that his name should be recorded in the _Police Gazette_ while the girl, who may be the real offender, is not charged and, even when the girl is committed to the care of the State, her offending is not recorded in the _Police Gazette_. =(3) Corporal Punishment Abolished= By the Statutes Amendment Act 1936 the power which formerly existed for the Court to order a whipping was abolished in so far as children are concerned. (The penalty of whipping was later abolished in all other cases by section 30 of the Crimes Amendment Act 1941.) Representations have been made to this Committee that the abolition of corporal punishment as a deterrent may have led to an increase in sexual misbehaviour. It was pointed out that parents and school teachers may resort to physical chastisement where thought desirable, and it was suggested that a Magistrate should have power to order a whipping in suitable cases. There is, however, a big difference between a parent or teacher himself punishing by the cane or strap soon after
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   >>  



Top keywords:
recorded
 
charged
 
offending
 
Crimes
 

Police

 

offence

 

whipping

 

Gazette

 

committed

 

parents


commission

 

abolished

 

misbehaviour

 

offender

 

Amendment

 

suggested

 

desirable

 
Magistrate
 
suitable
 

thought


chastisement

 

punishing

 
sophisticated
 

teacher

 

parent

 

Corporal

 
entices
 

anomalous

 

difference

 
physical

deterrent

 
penalty
 

concerned

 

children

 
section
 

punishment

 

corporal

 

Committee

 

Representations

 

increase


resort

 
teachers
 
Statutes
 

Punishment

 

Abolished

 

existed

 

sexual

 

pointed

 

school

 
abolition