FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   >>  
rymen. *The Sanctity of Treaties.* But we recognize that all hopes of settled peace between the nations, and indeed of any civilized relations between the nations, rest on the maintenance inviolate of the sanctity of treaty obligations. We can never hope to put law for war if solemn international compacts can be torn up at the will of any power involved. These obligations are felt by us to be the more stringently binding in the case of guaranteed neutrality. For the steady extension of neutralization appears to us to be one of the surest ways of the progressive elimination of war from the face of the earth. All these considerations take on a more imperative cogency when the treaty rights of a small people are threatened by a great world power. We therefore believe that when Germany refused to respect the neutrality of Belgium, which she herself had guaranteed, Great Britain had no option, either in international law or in Christian ethics, but to defend the people of Belgium. The Imperial Chancellor of Germany has himself admitted, on Aug. 4, that the protest of the Luxembourg and Belgian Governments was "just," and that Germany was doing "wrong" and acting "contrary to the dictates of international law." His only excuse was "necessity"--which recalls our Milton's phrase, "necessity, the tyrant's plea." It has cost us all the deepest pain to find the Germany which we love so intensely committing this act of lawless aggression on a weak people, and a Christian nation becoming a mere army with army ethics. We loathe war of any kind. A war with Germany cuts us to the very quick. But we sincerely believe that Great Britain in this conflict is fighting for conscience, justice, Europe, humanity, and lasting peace. *Dictated Terms.* This conviction is deepened by the antecedents of the present unhappy war. In allowing her ally Austria to dictate terms to Servia which were quite incompatible with the independence of that little State, Germany gave proof of her disregard for the rights of smaller States. A similar disregard for the sovereign rights of greater States was shown in the demand that Russia should demobilize her forces. It was quite open to Germany to have answered Russia's mobilization with a counter-mobilization without resorting to war. Many other nations have mobilized to defend their frontiers without declaring war. Alike indirectly in regard to Servia and directly in regard to Russia, Germany was in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   >>  



Top keywords:

Germany

 

people

 

international

 

rights

 
nations
 

Russia

 

neutrality

 

Servia

 
States
 

necessity


guaranteed
 
disregard
 

Britain

 

defend

 

ethics

 

Christian

 

Belgium

 

treaty

 

obligations

 

mobilization


regard
 

declaring

 

greater

 

loathe

 

frontiers

 

conflict

 
fighting
 
smaller
 

sincerely

 
indirectly

directly

 

deepest

 
intensely
 

committing

 

nation

 
conscience
 
aggression
 

lawless

 

sovereign

 

mobilized


allowing

 

unhappy

 

antecedents

 
present
 

answered

 
Austria
 

dictate

 

incompatible

 

independence

 
forces