FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   >>  
caliber, can hardly be overestimated. The relative value of steel and compound armor is much debated, and at present the rivalry is great, but the weight of evidence and opinion seems to favor the all-steel plate. The hard face of a compound plate is supposed to break up the projectile, that is, make the projectile expend its energy on itself rather than upon the plate, and the backing of wrought iron is, by its greater ductility, to prevent the destruction of the plate. It seems probable that these two systems will approach each other as the development goes on. An alloy of nickel and steel is now attracting attention and bids fair to give very good results. The problem to be solved, as far as naval armor is concerned, is to get the greatest amount of protection with the least possible weight and volume, and this reduction of weight and volume must be accomplished, in the main, by reducing the thickness of the plates by increasing the resisting power of the material. In the compound plate great surface hardness is readily and safely attained, but it has not yet been definitely determined what the proper proportionate thickness of iron and steel is. A considerable thickness of steel is necessary to aid, by its stiffness, in preventing the very ductile iron from giving back to such an extent as to distort the steel face and thus tear or separate the parts of the plate. The ductile iron gives a very low resisting power, its duty being to hold the steel face up to its work. If now we substitute a soft steel plate in the place of the ductile iron, we will get greater resisting power, but our compound plate then becomes virtually an all-steel one, only differing in process of manufacture. The greatest faults of the compound plate are the imperfect welding of the parts and the lack of solidity of the iron. When fired at, the surface has a tendency to chip. In the all-steel plate we have the greatest resisting power throughout, but there are manufacturing difficulties, and surface hardness equal to that of the compound plate has not been obtained. The manufacturing difficulties are being gradually overcome, and artillerists are in high hopes that the requisite surface hardness will soon be obtained. The following may be stated as well proved: 1. That steel armor promises to replace both iron and compound. 2. That projectiles designed for the piercing of hard armor must be made of steel. 3. That the larger t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   >>  



Top keywords:
compound
 

resisting

 

surface

 

ductile

 

greatest

 

thickness

 
hardness
 
weight
 
difficulties
 

greater


obtained

 

volume

 

manufacturing

 
projectile
 

stiffness

 

projectiles

 

giving

 

substitute

 

preventing

 

distort


extent

 

larger

 

designed

 

separate

 
piercing
 

differing

 

replace

 

promises

 
artillerists
 

overcome


gradually

 

proved

 
stated
 

requisite

 
process
 

manufacture

 

virtually

 

faults

 
imperfect
 

tendency


solidity
 
welding
 

plates

 

prevent

 

destruction

 

ductility

 
wrought
 

backing

 

probable

 

development