In the first edition the 'ignorant preacher' was a
'wretched little curate.' A rougher but more graphic phrase.]

[Footnote 145: There is here a discussion as to the relations between
'justice' and 'utility' upon which Fitzjames agreed with Mill. I dissent
from both, and think that Fitzjames would have been more consistent had
he agreed with me. I cannot, however, here try to unravel a rather
knotty point.]

[Footnote 146: P. 232.]

[Footnote 147: P. 334.]

[Footnote 148: P. 125.]

[Footnote 149: P. 69.]

[Footnote 150: P. 370.]

[Footnote 151: P. 294.]

[Footnote 152: P. 300.]

[Footnote 153: P. 288.]

[Footnote 154: P. 300.]

[Footnote 155: I repeat that I do not ask whether his interpretation be
correct.]

[Footnote 156: Pp. 49-60.]

[Footnote 157: P. 302.]

[Footnote 158: P. 287.]

[Footnote 159: P. 132.]

[Footnote 160: P. 75.]

[Footnote 161: P. 295.]

[Footnote 162: P. 343.]

[Footnote 163: P. 354.]

[Footnote 164: Bain's _J. S. Mill_, p. 111.]

[Footnote 165: _Digest of Law of Evidence_, preface.]

[Footnote 166: I have to thank Mr. A. H. Millar, of Dundee, for some
papers and recollections referring to this election.]

[Footnote 167: They were substantially republished in the _Contemporary
Review_ for December 1873 and January 1874.]

[Footnote 168: See prefaces to _History of the Criminal Law_ and to the
_Digest of the Criminal Law_.]

[Footnote 169: The introduction is dated April 1877.]

[Footnote 170: Preface to _History of Criminal Law_.]

[Footnote 171: 'Jenkins _v._ Cook,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division, i.
80-107.]

[Footnote 172: 'Clifton v. Ridsdale,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division,
i. 316-367; and ii. 276-353.]

[Footnote 173: 'Hughes v. Edwards,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division, ii.
361-371.]

[Footnote 174: B. November 8, 1831. d. November 24, 1891.]

[Footnote 175: Some account of the reports of these Commissions is given
in the _History of Criminal Law_, ii. 45-58, 65-72. The Fugitive Slave
Commission was appointed in consequence of a case in which the commander
of an English ship in a Mohammedan port was summoned to give up a slave
who had gone on board. A paper laid before the Committee by Fitzjames is
reprinted in the first passage cited. He thinks that international law
prescribes the surrender of the slave; and that we should not try to
evade this 'revolting' consequence by a fiction as to the
'exterritoriality' of a ship of war, which might lea