FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  
324. [133] See _Report of Commission of Investigation_, Senate Ex. Doc. No. 7, Fifty-third Congress, third session. [134] Particulars are taken from a pamphlet by five members of the New York Bar and issued by the Social Reform Club, New York, in 1900. [135] See the article by Judge Seabury, _The Abuses of Injunctions, in The Arena_, June, 1903. [136] See the New York daily papers, January 31, 1906. CHAPTER VII KARL MARX AND THE ECONOMICS OF SOCIALISM I The first approach to a comprehensive treatment by Marx of the materialistic conception of history appeared in 1847, several months before the publication of the _Communist Manifesto_, in "La Misere de la Philosophie,"[137] the famous polemic with which Marx assailed J. P. Proudhon's _La Philosophie de la Misere_. Marx had worked out his theory at least two years before, so Engels tells us, and in his writings of that period there are several evidences of the fact. In "La Misere de la Philosophie," the theory is fundamental to the work, and not merely the subject of incidental allusion. This little book, all too little known in England and America, is therefore important from this historical point of view. In it, Marx for the first time shows his complete confidence in the theory. It needed confidence little short of sublime to challenge Proudhon in the audacious manner of this scintillating critique. The torrential eloquence, the scornful satire, and fierce invective of the attack, have rather tended to obscure for readers of a later generation the real merit of the book, the importance of the fundamental idea that history must be interpreted in the light of economic development, that economic evolution determines social life. The book is important for two other reasons. First, it was the author's first serious essay in economic science--in the preface he boldly and frankly calls himself an economist--and, second, in it appears a full and generous recognition of that brilliant coterie of English Socialist writers of the Ricardian school from whom Marx has been unjustly, and almost spitefully, charged with "pillaging" his principal ideas. What led Marx to launch out upon the troubled sea of economic science, when all his predilections were for the study of pure philosophy, was the fact that his philosophical studies had led him to a point whence further progress seemed impossible, except by way of economics. The Introduction to "A Contribution
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

economic

 

Philosophie

 

theory

 

Misere

 

Proudhon

 

fundamental

 

confidence

 
important
 

science

 

history


sublime

 

determines

 

evolution

 

development

 

social

 

reasons

 
audacious
 

manner

 

invective

 

attack


fierce

 

satire

 

critique

 

scintillating

 

torrential

 

eloquence

 
scornful
 

challenge

 

importance

 

interpreted


obscure

 

tended

 

readers

 

generation

 

predilections

 

troubled

 

principal

 

pillaging

 
launch
 

philosophy


philosophical
 
economics
 

Introduction

 
Contribution
 

impossible

 
studies
 

progress

 

charged

 

spitefully

 

economist