FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   >>  
se letters were signed, "W.H. Stephens," and they contained inquiries after the Orton family, and also after Miss Mary Anne Loader, who was an old sweetheart of Arthur Orton's, long resident in Wapping. They enclosed as portraits of Arthur Orton's wife and child, certain photographic likenesses which were clearly portraits of the Claimant's wife and child; and though they purported to be written by "W.H. Stephens," a friend of Arthur Orton's just arrived from Australia, it was suspected that the letters--which were evidently in a feigned hand--were really written by the Claimant. They manifested that desire for information about Wapping folks, and particularly the Ortons, which the Claimant was known to have exhibited on more occasions than one; and they indicated a wish to get this information by a ruse, and without permitting the writer to be seen. But the correspondence showed that the sisters of Orton had discovered, or at least believed that they had discovered, that the writer was in truth their brother Arthur. The Claimant, however, being called in and questioned, solemnly affirmed that the letters were "forgeries," designed by his enemies to "ruin his cause." Nor was it until he was pressed in cross-examination, three years later, that he reluctantly confessed that his charges of forgery were false; and that, in fact, he, and no one else, had written the Stephens' letters. The Claimant's solemn assurances did not convince all his supporters at the meeting at the Swan, but they satisfied some; and funds were still found for prosecuting the Chancery, and next the great Common Law suit which was technically an action for the purpose of ejecting Col. Lushington from Tichborne house, which had been let to him. Col. Lushington was then a supporter of the Claimant, and had not the least objection to be ejected. But the action at once raised the question whether the Claimant had a right to eject him. Of course that depended on whether he was, or was not, the young man who was so long believed to have perished in the "Bella;" and accordingly this was the issue that the jury had to try on Thursday, the 11th of May, 1871, that Sergeant Ballantine rose to address the jury on behalf of the Claimant, and it was not until the 6th of March, 1872, that the trial was concluded--the proceedings having extended to 103 days. On both sides a large number of witnesses were examined, many being persons of respectability, while some were
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   >>  



Top keywords:

Claimant

 

Arthur

 

letters

 

written

 
Stephens
 

believed

 

information

 

Lushington

 
action
 

discovered


writer
 
Wapping
 

portraits

 

objection

 

supporter

 

technically

 

satisfied

 

convince

 

supporters

 

meeting


prosecuting
 

Chancery

 

ejected

 

respectability

 

purpose

 

ejecting

 
Common
 
Tichborne
 

witnesses

 
number

examined

 

behalf

 
Ballantine
 

address

 

extended

 
proceedings
 
concluded
 

Sergeant

 

depended

 

raised


question

 

perished

 

Thursday

 
persons
 

solemnly

 
evidently
 

feigned

 

suspected

 

Australia

 
friend