FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254  
255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   >>   >|  
and commonplaces. It was a piece of bad taste to select Brougham (who had nothing to do with Dover) for the performance of this office, which would have been more appropriately discharged by the local authority in the chair, although he might not have been able to make such a flourish as the practised orator favoured the company with. The Duke himself hates to be thus bepraised, and it is painful to see Brougham and him in any way connected, though for so ephemeral a purpose. The Duke's health might be proposed in three lines of Ovid, which express the position he fills more, and probably better, than the most studied oration could do:-- Si titulos, annosque tuos numerare velimus, Facta premant annos. Pro te, fortissime, vota Publica suscipimus, Bacchi tibi sumimus haustus. It turned out a complete _Tory_ celebration. There was an almost unmixed array of Tory names at the banquet, and one Whig lord (Poltimore), who happened to be at Dover declined attending. [1] [A great entertainment was given to the Duke of Wellington as Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports on the 30th August. Lord Brougham attended it, and delivered an oration of the most hyperbolical panegyric.] September 5th, 1839 {p.238} Among other bad signs of these times, one is the decay of _loyalty_ in the Tory party; the Tory principle is completely destroyed by party rage. No Opposition was ever more rabid than this is, no people ever treated or spoke of the Sovereign with such marked disrespect. They seem not to care one straw for the Crown, its dignity, or its authority, because the head on which it is placed does not nod with benignity to them. An example of this took place the other day, when at a dinner at Shrewsbury the company refused to drink the health of the new Lord Lieutenant, the Duke of Sutherland (a man not personally obnoxious), because the Duchess of Sutherland is at the head of the Queen's female household. This reproach does not apply to the leaders of the party, who are too wise and too decorous to hold such language or to approve of such conduct;[2] but is the _animus_ which distinguishes the tail and the body, and they take no pains to conceal it. [2] This was before the Bradshaw and Roby exhibitions. September 7th, 1839 {p.238} The result of the Cambridge and Manchester elections proves (if any proof was wanting), how utterly the cause of Governmen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254  
255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Brougham
 

oration

 

Sutherland

 

health

 

company

 

September

 

authority

 

dignity

 

people

 
Opposition

benignity

 

treated

 

destroyed

 

principle

 

disrespect

 

marked

 

completely

 
loyalty
 
Sovereign
 
conceal

Bradshaw

 

exhibitions

 

distinguishes

 

result

 

wanting

 

utterly

 

Governmen

 

Cambridge

 
Manchester
 

elections


proves
 
animus
 

Lieutenant

 
personally
 
obnoxious
 
Duchess
 

dinner

 

Shrewsbury

 
refused
 
female

language
 

approve

 

conduct

 
decorous
 
household
 

reproach

 

leaders

 

happened

 

ephemeral

 

purpose