FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   >>  
e _New York Sun_, pp. 53-57. I. The Panama Canal conflict is due to the fact that the Governments of Great Britain and the United States do not agree upon the interpretation of Article III, No. 1, of the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty of September 18, 1901, which stipulates as follows:-- "The Canal shall be free and open to the vessels of commerce and of war of all nations..., on terms of entire equality, so that there shall be no discrimination against any such nation, or its citizens or subjects, in respect of the conditions and charges of traffic, or otherwise. Such conditions and charges of traffic shall be just and equitable." By Section 5 of the Panama Canal Act of August 24, 1912, the President of the United States is authorised to prescribe, and from time to time to change, the tolls to be levied upon vessels using the Panama Canal, but the section orders that _no tolls whatever shall be levied upon vessels engaged in the coasting trade of the United States_, and also that, if the tolls to be charged should be based upon net registered tonnage for ships of commerce, the tolls shall not exceed one dollar and twenty-five cents per net registered ton nor be less, _for other vessels than those of the United States or her citizens_, than the estimated proportionate cost of the actual maintenance and operation of the Canal[1]. [1] As regards the enactment of Section 5 of the Panama Canal Act that the vessels of the Republic of Panama shall be entirely exempt from the payment of tolls, see below IX, p. 48. Now Great Britain asserts that since these enactments set forth in Section 5 of the Panama Canal Act are in favour of vessels of the United States, they comprise a violation of Article III, No. 1, of the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty which stipulates that the vessels of all nations shall be treated on terms of entire equality. This assertion made by Great Britain is met by the Memorandum which, when signing the Panama Canal Act, President Taft left to accompany the Act. The President contends that, in view of the fact that the Panama Canal has been constructed by the United States wholly at her own cost, upon territory ceded to her by the Republic of Panama, the United States possesses the power to allow her own vessels to use the Canal upon _such terms as she sees fit_, and that she may, therefore, permit her vessels to pass through the Canal either without the payment
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   >>  



Top keywords:
Panama
 

vessels

 

States

 

United

 

Britain

 

Section

 
President
 

commerce

 

nations

 
equality

traffic

 

charges

 

conditions

 

citizens

 
levied
 

entire

 

Article

 
registered
 

Republic

 

stipulates


payment

 

Treaty

 
Pauncefote
 

estimated

 

operation

 

proportionate

 
favour
 

actual

 
maintenance
 
enactments

asserts

 

exempt

 

enactment

 

contends

 

possesses

 

territory

 

permit

 

wholly

 

constructed

 
assertion

treated
 

violation

 

Memorandum

 

accompany

 
signing
 

comprise

 

discrimination

 
respect
 

subjects

 

nation