FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149  
150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  
"Q. But were not the people of Israel discharged to take any usury or profit for lent money from their brethren? Deut. 23:19. "A. This law seems to have been peculiar to the Jewish state, and that in regard of their estates being so divided, settled, and secured to their families by the year jubilee, and their not being employed in trading or making purchases like other nations, so that they had no occasion to borrow money but for the present subsistence of their families. But for strangers, who had another way of living, the Israelites were allowed to lend upon usury, and to share with them in their profits, Deut. 23:20, which shows that the taking of interest is not oppressive in itself; for they are frequently prohibited to oppress a stranger, and yet allowed to take usury from him. Exod. 22:21, and 23:9." The reader will notice that the definition of usury is defective. The reader will also notice that there are no Scripture references given to prove that any interest can be taken. This is singular, since throughout the Catechism Scripture references are profuse in confirmation of the answers. If a single passage had been found that could be twisted into an approval the reference would have been given. He rests the permission to take usury wholly on human reason, though in direct opposition to the Scripture references he had first given to prove that the gaining of wealth by usury was unlawful. He does not claim to get this answer from the Bible. He rests this answer on the law of the land and the purposes of the borrower, and says it is not worse than taking a rental for land anyway. The questions with regard to the customs of the people of Israel are completely met in the Second and Third Chapters of this book. Fisher, also, we find from his catechism published in 1753, thought it necessary to make some excuse for the custom in his time. High interest he finds condemned, but moderate interest he tries to defend. "Q. 32. What is it to take usury, according to the proper signification of the word? "A. It is to take gain, profit, or interest, for the loan of money. "Q. 33. What kind of usury or interest is lawful? "A. That which is moderate, easy, and no way oppressive. Deut. 23:20, compared with Ex. 22:21. "Q. 34. How do you prove that moderate usury is lawful? "A. From the very light of nature, which t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149  
150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  



Top keywords:

interest

 

moderate

 

Scripture

 

references

 

taking

 

notice

 

allowed

 
oppressive
 

reader

 

profit


answer
 

lawful

 

families

 

people

 
Israel
 
regard
 

Chapters

 

gaining

 

wealth

 

Fisher


Second

 

rental

 

borrower

 

questions

 
customs
 

purposes

 

completely

 
unlawful
 

excuse

 

compared


nature

 

signification

 

opposition

 

custom

 

published

 

thought

 

proper

 

defend

 
condemned
 

catechism


twisted

 

Israelites

 

living

 

strangers

 

frequently

 

prohibited

 

oppress

 

profits

 
subsistence
 

present