FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
first the material and workmanship. I don't want any jobbing carpenter or joiner, whom I may employ, to bring a lump of putty in his tool basket. I prefer leave the use of putty to the painters. I don't want jobbing plumbers to spend three days upon the roof, soldering up a crack in the gutter, and, when done, leaving fresher cracks behind them. The practice is something akin to "cut and come again." I don't want a contractor to undertake a job at a price that he knows will not pay, and then throw the fault of his bankruptcy on "that blackguard building." I don't want any more hodmen to be carrying up the weight of themselves in their hod, as well as their bricks; I would much prefer seeing the poor human machines tempering the mortar or wheeling the barrow, while the donkey engine, the hydraulic lift, or the old gray horse, worked the pulley. I don't want house doors to be made badly, hung badly, or composed of green and unseasoned timber. I don't want houses built first and designed afterwards, or, rather, wedged into shape, and braced into form. I don't want to be compelled to pay any workman a fair day's wages for a half day's work. I don't want an employer to act towards his workmen as if he thought their sinews and thews were of iron, instead of flesh and blood. I don't want any kind of old rubbish of brick and stone to be bundled into walls and partitions, and then plastered over "hurry-skurry." Trade infamy, like murder, will out, sooner or later. I don't want men to wear flesh and bone, and waste sweat and blood, in forms of labor to which machinery can be applied, and by which valuable human life and labor can be better and more profitably utilized. * * * * * CORRESPONDENCE. _The Editors are not responsible for the opinions expressed by their Correspondents._ * * * * * ACTION OF THE RECIPROCATING PARTS OF STEAM ENGINES. MESSRS. EDITORS:--I have hesitated about the propriety of replying to the criticisms of your correspondent, J. E. Hendricks, upon my paper, on the action of the reciprocating parts of steam engines. It is not to be expected that a truth so opposed to commonly received notions--the reception of which requires so much to be unlearned--should at once receive the assent of every one. Some odd fancies on the subject are likely to be ventilated first. But your correspondent touches the r
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
correspondent
 

jobbing

 

prefer

 

opinions

 

responsible

 

valuable

 
profitably
 

applied

 

CORRESPONDENCE

 
Editors

utilized

 

machinery

 

murder

 

bundled

 
partitions
 

plastered

 

rubbish

 
skurry
 

sooner

 

infamy


requires

 

reception

 
unlearned
 

notions

 

received

 

expected

 
opposed
 

commonly

 
receive
 
assent

ventilated

 

touches

 

subject

 

fancies

 

engines

 

MESSRS

 

ENGINES

 

EDITORS

 

hesitated

 
Correspondents

ACTION
 

RECIPROCATING

 

propriety

 

action

 
reciprocating
 

Hendricks

 

replying

 
criticisms
 

expressed

 

wedged