FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   >>  
spirit and tenacity, being a fair match for the legionaries under ordinary circumstances, and superior to most other adversaries. It is uncertain how the various arms of the service were organized internally. We do not hear of any divisions corresponding to the Roman legions or to modern regiments; yet it is difficult to suppose that there were not some such bodies. Perhaps each satrap of a province commanded the troops raised within his government, taking the actual lead of the cavalry or the infantry at his discretion. The Crown doubtless appointed the commanders-in-chief--the _Sparapets, Spaha-pets, or Sipehbeds_, as well as the other generals (_arzbeds_), the head of the commissariat (_hambarapet_ or _hambarahapet_), and the commander of the elephants (_zendkapet_). The satraps may have acted as colonels of regiments under the arzbeds, and may probably have had the nomination of the subordinate (regimental) officers. The great national standard was the famous "leathern apron of the blacksmith," originally unadorned, but ultimately covered with jewels, which has been described in a former chapter. This precious palladium was, however, but rarely used, its place being supplied for the most part by standards of a more ordinary character. These appear by the monuments to have been of two kinds. Both consisted primarily of a pole and a cross-bar; but in the one kind the crossbar sustained a single ring with a bar athwart it, while below depended two woolly tassels; in the other, three striated balls rose from the cross-bar, while below the place of the tassels was taken by two similar balls. It is difficult to say what these emblems symbolized, or why they were varied. In both the representations where they appear the standards accompany cavalry, so that they cannot reasonably be assigned to different arms of the service. That the number of standards carried into battle was considerable may be gathered from the fact that on one occasion, when the defeat sustained was not very complete, a Persian army left in the enemy's hands as many as twenty-eight of them. During the Sassanian period there was nothing very remarkable in the Persian tactics. The size of armies generally varied from 30,000 to 60,000 men, though sometimes 100,000, and on one occasion as many as 140,000, are said to have been assembled. The bulk of the troops were footmen, the proportion of the horse probably never equalling one third of a mixed army.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   >>  



Top keywords:

standards

 

difficult

 
tassels
 

cavalry

 

Persian

 

troops

 
varied
 
service
 

ordinary

 

sustained


arzbeds
 
regiments
 
occasion
 

representations

 

emblems

 

symbolized

 
depended
 

crossbar

 

single

 

primarily


consisted

 

athwart

 

similar

 

striated

 

woolly

 

gathered

 

armies

 

equalling

 

generally

 

tactics


Sassanian

 

period

 

remarkable

 

assembled

 

footmen

 
proportion
 
During
 

number

 

carried

 

battle


assigned
 
considerable
 

twenty

 

defeat

 

complete

 

accompany

 
commanded
 

province

 
raised
 

government