s faithfully,
C. KINGSLEY.
* * * * *
TO MISS A. BUCKLEY[11]
_Holly House, Barking, E. February 2, 1871._
Dear Miss Buckley,--I have read Darwin's first volume,[12] and like it
very much. It is overwhelming as proving the origin of man from some
lower form, but that, I rather think, hardly anyone doubts now.
He is very weak, as yet, on my objection about the "hair," but promises
a better solution in the second volume.
Have you seen Mivart's book, "Genesis of Species"? It is exceedingly
clever, and well worth reading. The arguments against Natural Selection
as the exclusive mode of development are some of them exceedingly
strong, and very well put, and it is altogether a most readable and
interesting book.
Though he uses some weak and bad arguments, and underrates the power of
Natural Selection, yet I think I agree with his conclusion in the main,
and am inclined to think it is more philosophical than my own. It is a
book that I think will please Sir Charles Lyell.--Believe me, yours very
truly,
ALFRED R. WALLACE.
* * * * *
TO MISS A. BUCKLEY
_Holly House, Barking, E. March 3, 1871._
Dear Miss Buckley,--Thanks for your note. I am hard at work criticising
Darwin. I admire his Moral Sense chapter as much as anything in the
book. It is both original and the most satisfactory of all the
theories, if not quite satisfactory....--Believe me yours very
faithfully,
ALFRED R. WALLACE.
P.S.--Darwin's book on the whole is wonderful! There are plenty of
points open to criticism, but it is a marvellous contribution to the
history of the development of the forms of life.
* * * * *
SIR C. LYELL TO A.R. WALLACE
_February 15, 1876._
Dear Wallace,--I have read the Preface,[13] and like and approve of it
much. I do not believe there is a word which Darwin would wish altered.
It is high time this modest assertion of your claims as an independent
originator of Natural Selection should be published.--Ever most truly,
CHA. LYELL.
* * * * *
SIR J. HOOKER TO A.R. WALLACE
_Royal Gardens, Kew. August 2, 1880._
My dear Wallace,--I think you have made an immense advance to our
knowledge of the ways and means of distribution, and bridged many great
gaps.[14] Your reasoning seems to me to be sound throughout, though I am
not prepared to receive it in all its details.
|